From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3112F0C69 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763745745; cv=none; b=juVX3f5HRaYN8MIpU5I/pQs2R/JzQgsFF65/08KOO7C6LsYhBonW6G9T1zv+HdjnkHyHRKNiNs73g/mMvPh++PlU4a6yUo8yzf8LkfC0nUkMMpgtXJ1azIB2cSe6q1VR3nzdKA5sl9+XPN+yn1zZWPeTII1NS1YDYIL6gb/+i9c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763745745; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Iy2ZdRsXKFvg6x6OD9HY3L9EGt3fFluG/yG0XoqYvuQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RvD6kceTqnTZLy1Ms5niyJVJBUJD2+7cBbvfOkOdrLTFOtsxgtCFmOZmOzxaSExSW1NI+z/vygt8RyoQtlgucntyPd9A4Jf/maQBxB6Kygtu4YU83ZrQrnWQ06Lqd8c5XeRGI1sIcQrWFoTZD3e7+xNF7Jg0zPQ3K8H0sjfd1+A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=YsOtqg8Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="YsOtqg8Q" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dChqF0BXCzlvDSB; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:22:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1763745735; x=1766337736; bh=Iy2ZdRsXKFvg6x6OD9HY3L9E Gt3fFluG/yG0XoqYvuQ=; b=YsOtqg8QBiSH9kUiw72GOr270TmsH+WceXfe4+DM BwNXZdEkLa9H6l6EmwvkZFf4mWmPJeH09gfHH5M8FU+wOf+xWYlc8VGv/0WnWb2Y iu55kIaJfR2darG+WjFtENZHB0kMuc9/Y5ABi9gBWOGItVjtbapbifd2RfzHrRbM fN4HD+4qyIqlcx4vWSrhlmIOicGu/XM5SCEdxX2fml1lysfz773rjm8dNp/WIqaU jDxJMDLvx5jDVkArzAyIziBrBZahhKLCfS9wq61WBBwVMAHhSlpXYye5dojL4kOU xSyP53rwiYiETmDjhp9o53GUJsTbZSmJuAn1ImF15auA0A== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id IzO1kv_dTeq7; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.119.48.131] (unknown [104.135.180.219]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dChq85sbbzlvDSC; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <452a2c4c-e9eb-40a0-922b-a1b99048ee08@acm.org> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:22:10 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Kernel build fails if both CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF and CONFIG_CHELSIO_T4=y (was CONFIG_KCSAN) To: Alan Maguire , Potnuri Bharat Teja Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , Martin KaFai Lau , Nilay Shroff References: <2412725b-916c-47bd-91c3-c2d57e3e6c7b@acm.org> <7161e3e3-7bd0-47ec-892d-72a58b06df33@acm.org> <87641066-a837-41ff-acbc-9f4453d0ae58@oracle.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/20/25 2:18 PM, Alan Maguire wrote: > FYI I verified that changing sched_class to ch_sched_class like the > following resolves the build issue: Since the Chelsio cxgb4 maintainer has not yet responded, how about posting these changes as a formal patch? If this change is posted as a formal patch, feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Thanks, Bart.