From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D04C54E94 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233664AbjAXRLl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:11:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231975AbjAXRLl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:11:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEBC10CD for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:11:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id v23so15389444plo.1 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:11:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0cMew/25Y2xZKE+JE9Wfch0cfjDBFdiCoU8TP+pO8TM=; b=azKMcYUAH0Y2UPP3LArhk5ME0ci+U4EUR4KFkjaoO0PtpztrRQq7EHuWw5pJJ3n1q8 Q3SaqTt/mfz6BmVLmH1kcnBVPkHDtegIqjmgzueIZ6rF+hCvVU41d7ICNOmmah78FcCe ungSFx8vkvU2TwKEEHEQhQ+RXVRbSDHKCLF5u1BuY83DUNDNFQB1szXUh+Regrgh8p8V tbBdcOXk4Dz39avcyUVivkbALty5hRC9PzwyBRG3olsM7ff9LOBDYPhn41ujYWsz59VJ 2RqN5nvyeKJWt4HiVP3FHrcOjT1VXRMLcrrApfTBh6Py8tCCjr77a5F0CIqoEPLkdRMB qvlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0cMew/25Y2xZKE+JE9Wfch0cfjDBFdiCoU8TP+pO8TM=; b=Ox24zmWhDq5nChWmNvh0X6C0vBnx2B2tH6P284/MfYYBOul1vPdJDuzndQYoKgnJSe NkThipycg7j+C3O2GTEVqDpv8HZDhCVDdNSPWS6LdS8OasNmzOJin25DWOQlB11mcZ23 03CNTcpVtr0UOxeMf/0x1uRXMb6lk9+GIuvJbmOkuD8BpzWKnEp8OKDqsdwEzMNzXd1X oIR2g55klFzKfTW1NsQYctimw7L/DwvMqHIsLj1KDSWYCcf1ARoshTBt2QcVat0iHvRE 93B4IODBHMy7Di/fcjfusSclvYB9BePjxjuo3XUn2etV5eYxkiTXNlJ7SmAzgSD9aGel ZPEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2ko/yi1UJg7RyB2SaiLhISMiJImJlCxk5Vbz2IR1E4WWa+RDVEwL umPEWu9mglKiwaRMtP0FtiE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsn+NdJhpE9ItUvpVZxiuthjefm/57vFZyzrqJ+0c517vRzdp1issjEPchIxGBME0APdNzjiA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:4f08:b0:b8:36a7:c5b0 with SMTP id gi8-20020a056a204f0800b000b836a7c5b0mr28557439pzb.13.1674580299762; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:11:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:10d:c085:21c8::13fb? ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:69a5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6-20020a6566c6000000b0047917991e83sm1696461pgw.48.2023.01.24.09.11.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:11:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47982993-be39-cf9d-0450-a659554cd39f@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:11:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Calls bpf_setsockopt() on a ktls enabled socket. Content-Language: en-US To: Martin KaFai Lau , Kui-Feng Lee Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com References: <20230121025716.3039933-1-kuifeng@meta.com> <20230121025716.3039933-3-kuifeng@meta.com> <737b9af6-4e2a-9da7-3968-fcb466e1eb8a@linux.dev> From: Kui-Feng Lee In-Reply-To: <737b9af6-4e2a-9da7-3968-fcb466e1eb8a@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On 1/23/23 16:52, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > On 1/20/23 6:57 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote: >>   void test_setget_sockopt(void) >>   { >>       cg_fd = test__join_cgroup(CG_NAME); >> @@ -118,6 +188,7 @@ void test_setget_sockopt(void) >>       test_tcp(AF_INET); >>       test_udp(AF_INET6); >>       test_udp(AF_INET); >> +    test_ktls(); > > Although not related to the IPPROTO_IPV6 code path, it seems pretty > cheap to test AF_INET6 also like the above tests? > Sure