From: Sahil <icegambit91@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Cc: martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Mount bpffs on provided dir instead of parent dir
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 01:42:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4911236.31r3eYUQgx@valdaarhun> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f65b98c-a442-4316-884c-a877233edc60@isovalent.com>
Hi,
On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 4:05:32 PM IST Quentin Monnet wrote:
> [...]
> Yes, we should remove this second condition too for files. Running
> "is_bpffs(name)" makes no sense as we know we'll have an error at this
> point.
>
> What we could do to improve the current code, however, is returning an
> error from mount_bpffs_for_pin() if the file exists, rather than
> mounting the bpffs and waiting for bpf_obj_pin() to return the error.
> This would prevent bpftool from mounting the bpffs when we already know
> the operation will fail.
>
> Quentin
Sorry for the delay in replying. I have got a patch ready and have
incorporated this as well. I need to run a few tests and then I'll be
able to send a new patch.
Thanks,
Sahil
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 13:05 [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Mount bpffs on provided dir instead of parent dir Sahil Siddiq
2024-02-29 14:59 ` Quentin Monnet
2024-02-29 19:50 ` Sahil
2024-03-01 20:28 ` Sahil
2024-03-04 13:50 ` Quentin Monnet
2024-03-04 20:34 ` Sahil
2024-03-05 10:35 ` Quentin Monnet
2024-03-07 20:12 ` Sahil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4911236.31r3eYUQgx@valdaarhun \
--to=icegambit91@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox