From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Always allow sleepable programs on syscalls
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:37:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b3512ea-34a5-4ffd-8b73-1b2c95929b77@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df4e8730627c311b18fb0634989070eaa1567c75.1772804199.git.vmalik@redhat.com>
On 6/3/26 21:40, Viktor Malik wrote:
> Sleepable BPF programs can only be attached to selected functions. For
> convenience, the error injection list was originally used, which
> contains syscalls and several other functions.
>
> When error injection is disabled (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION=n),
> that list is empty and sleepable tracing programs are effectively
> unavailable. In such a case, at least enable sleepable programs on
> syscalls. For discussion why syscalls were chosen, see [1].
>
> To detect that a function is a syscall handler, we check for
> arch-specific prefixes for the most common architectures. Unfortunately,
> the prefixes are hard-coded in arch syscall code so we need to hard-code
> them, too.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQK6qP8izg+k9yV0vdcT-+=axtFQ2fKw7D-2Ei-V6WS5Dw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index d92cf2821657..458fc528ccc6 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -24930,6 +24930,8 @@ static int check_attach_modify_return(unsigned long addr, const char *func_name)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION
> +
> /* list of non-sleepable functions that are otherwise on
> * ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION list
> */
> @@ -24951,6 +24953,55 @@ static int check_non_sleepable_error_inject(u32 btf_id)
> return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_non_sleepable_error_inject, btf_id);
> }
>
> +static int check_attach_sleepable(u32 btf_id, unsigned long addr, const char *func_name)
> +{
> + /* fentry/fexit/fmod_ret progs can be sleepable if they are
> + * attached to ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION and are not in denylist.
> + */
> + if (!check_non_sleepable_error_inject(btf_id) &&
> + within_error_injection_list(addr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +/* Unfortunately, the arch-specific prefixes are hard-coded in arch syscall code
> + * so we need to hard-code them, too. Ftrace has arch_syscall_match_sym_name()
> + * but that just compares two concrete function names.
> + */> +static bool has_arch_syscall_prefix(const char *func_name)
> +{
> +#if defined(__x86_64__)
> + return !strncmp(func_name, "__x64_", 6);
> +#elif defined(__i386__)
> + return !strncmp(func_name, "__ia32_", 7);
> +#elif defined(__s390x__)
> + return !strncmp(func_name, "__s390x_", 8);
> +#elif defined(__aarch64__)
> + return !strncmp(func_name, "__arm64_", 8);
> +#elif defined(__riscv)
> + return !strncmp(func_name, "__riscv_", 8);
> +#elif defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)
> + return !strncmp(func_name, "sys_", 4);
LoongArch is missing here, as LoongArch supports trampoline.
#elif defined(__loongarch__)
return !strncmp(func_name, "sys_", 4);
After adding it,
Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Thanks,
Leon
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +/* Without error injection, allow sleepable progs on syscalls. */
> +
> +static int check_attach_sleepable(u32 btf_id, unsigned long addr, const char *func_name)
> +{
> + if (has_arch_syscall_prefix(func_name))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION */
> +
> int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
> @@ -25230,12 +25281,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> switch (prog->type) {
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> -
> - /* fentry/fexit/fmod_ret progs can be sleepable if they are
> - * attached to ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION and are not in denylist.
> - */
> - if (!check_non_sleepable_error_inject(btf_id) &&
> - within_error_injection_list(addr))
> + if (!check_attach_sleepable(btf_id, addr, tname))
> ret = 0;
> /* fentry/fexit/fmod_ret progs can also be sleepable if they are
> * in the fmodret id set with the KF_SLEEPABLE flag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 13:40 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Always allow sleepable and fmod_ret programs on syscalls Viktor Malik
2026-03-06 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Always allow sleepable " Viktor Malik
2026-03-06 16:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-09 2:37 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-03-06 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: Always allow fmod_ret " Viktor Malik
2026-03-06 16:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-09 2:40 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-06 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Move sleepable refcounted_kptr tests to syscalls Viktor Malik
2026-03-06 16:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b3512ea-34a5-4ffd-8b73-1b2c95929b77@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox