From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf: make trusted args nullable
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c8a90dbdc4677b57b19bc0d8b4109e3b6537aec.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510122823.1530682-1-vadfed@meta.com>
On Fri, 2024-05-10 at 05:28 -0700, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> Current verifier checks for the arg to be nullable after checking for
> certain pointer types. It prevents programs to pass NULL to kfunc args
> even if they are marked as nullable. This patchset adjusts verifier and
> changes bpf crypto kfuncs to allow null for IV parameter which is
> optional for some ciphers. Benchmark shows ~4% improvements when there
> is no need to initialise 0-sized dynptr.
>
> v2:
> - adjust kdoc accordingly
>
Hi Vadim, sorry for late response.
I think that this patch-set looks good,
but I'd like to ask you to add a dedicated test to the following file:
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c.
(crypto tests are for crypto and might be modified in the future
w/o consideration of verifier pathways they currently test).
Also nullable dynptr sounds kind-of funny.
As far as I understand, performance gains are due to omission of extra
function call. Did you consider inlining for bpf_dynptr_from_mem()?
Same way it is done for bpf_kptr_xchg() in verifier.c:do_misc_fixups().
Thanks,
Eduard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 12:28 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf: make trusted args nullable Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-10 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] bpf: verifier: make kfuncs args nullalble Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-21 19:48 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-10 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: crypto: make state and IV dynptr nullable Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-21 19:48 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-10 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests: bpf: crypto: use NULL instead of 0-sized dynptr Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-21 19:48 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-10 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests: bpf: crypto: adjust bench to use nullable IV Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-21 19:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-22 18:01 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-22 18:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-22 21:18 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-21 19:46 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
[not found] ` <912ac775-1505-468b-9030-88cbbf8e30f2@linux.dev>
[not found] ` <836e4a4ca07872fed42c0b2327dddecf47c572c0.camel@gmail.com>
2024-05-22 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf: make trusted args nullable Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-22 18:06 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c8a90dbdc4677b57b19bc0d8b4109e3b6537aec.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=vadfed@meta.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox