From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<andrii@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, <bjorn@kernel.org>,
<michal.kubiak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: check IFF_UP earlier in Tx path
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:57:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c993fb0-de7b-7671-8d0a-19bd7c49e70c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215143309.13145-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:33:09 +0100
> Xsk Tx can be triggered via either sendmsg() or poll() syscalls. These
> two paths share a call to common function xsk_xmit() which has two
> sanity checks within. A pseudo code example to show the two paths:
[...]
> @@ -627,17 +618,31 @@ static bool xsk_no_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static int xsk_check_common(struct xdp_sock *xs)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(!xsk_is_bound(xs)))
> + return -ENXIO;
> + if (unlikely(!(xs->dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
> + return -ENETDOWN;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
It's called several times in the code. Have you tried marking it inline
and compare the object code? I'm worrying a bit some beyond-smart
compiler can uninline these 4 lines and slow down things for no reason.
(it's okay to have inlines in C files if proven that not marking them
hurts a lot)
> +
> static int __xsk_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
The rest is:
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 14:33 [PATCH bpf] xsk: check IFF_UP earlier in Tx path Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-02-15 17:57 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-02-17 7:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c993fb0-de7b-7671-8d0a-19bd7c49e70c@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox