From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 17:23:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ed19773-2a26-4652-bd62-0fc0e5c1233e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08fda54a-f45e-7140-e5e8-fe2c3542547f@iogearbox.net>
On 24/05/2024 17:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 5/24/24 1:06 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> Adjust skb program test to run with checksum validation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
>
> BPF CI complains :
>
> [...]
>
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_skb_pkt_end.c:14:12: error: call to undeclared function 'BIT'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 14 | .flags = BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE,
> | ^
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:1429:42: note:
> expanded from macro 'BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE'
> 1429 | #define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE BIT(2)
> | ^
> 1 error generated.
> make: *** [Makefile:654:
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_pkt_end.test.o]
> Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: Leaving directory '/tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
> Error: Process completed with exit code 2.
Oops, looks like checkpatch.pl was too smart and replaced original
define with BIT() macro, but in one file only. I'll re-send it with
fixes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-24 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-24 11:06 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-24 11:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-24 16:18 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-05-24 16:23 ` Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2024-05-24 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ed19773-2a26-4652-bd62-0fc0e5c1233e@linux.dev \
--to=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadfed@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox