From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>,
martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:45:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f18c782-a09e-4584-8abb-0c81265840ad@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260308134614.29711-6-pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
On 8/3/26 21:46, Chengkaitao wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Replace per-kfunc btf_id chains in list/rbtree/res_lock and graph node
> checks with btf_id_in_kfunc_table() and static kfunc tables for easier
> maintenance.
>
Such refactoring should be the first patch? Less churn. Then, update the
list only.
However, is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(), is_bpf_res_spin_lock_kfunc(), and
BPF_RB_NODE should be excluded, because you didn't touch them in this
series.
Thanks,
Leon
> Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 5e32e02429c4..853716f599ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -12602,6 +12602,62 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_session_is_return)
> BTF_ID(func, bpf_stream_vprintk)
> BTF_ID(func, bpf_stream_print_stack)
>
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_pop_front,
> + KF_bpf_list_pop_back,
> + KF_bpf_list_del,
> + KF_bpf_list_front,
> + KF_bpf_list_back,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_first,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_last,
> + KF_bpf_list_empty,
> +};
> +
> +/* Kfuncs that take a list node argument (bpf_list_node *). */
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_del,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_first,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_last,
> +};
> +
> +/* Kfuncs that take an rbtree node argument (bpf_rb_node *). */
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_rbtree_node_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_remove,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_left,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_right,
> +};
> +
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_remove,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_first,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_root,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_left,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_right,
> +};
> +
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_res_spin_lock_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_lock,
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock,
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave,
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore,
> +};
> +
> +static bool btf_id_in_kfunc_table(u32 btf_id, const enum special_kfunc_type *kfuncs, int n)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
> + if (btf_id == special_kfunc_list[kfuncs[i]])
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
> {
> return func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_signal] ||
> @@ -13002,27 +13058,14 @@ static int check_reg_allocation_locked(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_
>
> static bool is_bpf_list_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_front] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_back] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_del] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_front] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_back] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_first] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_last] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_empty];
> + return btf_id_in_kfunc_table(btf_id, bpf_list_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_list_api_kfuncs));
> }
>
> static bool is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_remove] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_first] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_root] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_left] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_right];
> + return btf_id_in_kfunc_table(btf_id, bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs));
> }
>
> static bool is_bpf_iter_num_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> @@ -13040,10 +13083,8 @@ static bool is_bpf_graph_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
>
> static bool is_bpf_res_spin_lock_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore];
> + return btf_id_in_kfunc_table(btf_id, bpf_res_spin_lock_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_res_spin_lock_kfuncs));
> }
>
> static bool is_bpf_arena_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> @@ -13132,18 +13173,12 @@ static bool check_kfunc_is_graph_node_api(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>
> switch (node_field_type) {
> case BPF_LIST_NODE:
> - ret = (kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_del] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_first] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_last]);
> + ret = btf_id_in_kfunc_table(kfunc_btf_id, bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs));
> break;
> case BPF_RB_NODE:
> - ret = (kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_remove] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_left] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_right]);
> + ret = btf_id_in_kfunc_table(kfunc_btf_id, bpf_rbtree_node_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_rbtree_node_api_kfuncs));
> break;
> default:
> verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unexpected graph node argument type %s\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-08 13:46 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/5] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Chengkaitao
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Chengkaitao
2026-03-09 6:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-10 20:10 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-10 20:28 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/5] bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node Chengkaitao
2026-03-08 14:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-09 6:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-10 20:10 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/5] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Chengkaitao
2026-03-09 6:42 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Chengkaitao
2026-03-08 14:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-09 6:43 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-10 2:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier Chengkaitao
2026-03-09 6:45 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-03-10 20:10 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-11 5:36 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f18c782-a09e-4584-8abb-0c81265840ad@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox