BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 3/7] bpf: udp: Get rid of st_bucket_done
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 11:28:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fc1f65c-d950-42a5-b3d2-8e7adfcb4d45@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250428180036.369192-4-jordan@jrife.io>

On 4/28/25 11:00 AM, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Get rid of the st_bucket_done field to simplify UDP iterator state and
> logic. Before, st_bucket_done could be false if bpf_iter_udp_batch
> returned a partial batch; however, with the last patch ("bpf: udp: Make
> sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"),
> st_bucket_done == true is equivalent to iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> ---
>   net/ipv4/udp.c | 14 ++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 5fe22f4f43d7..57ac84a77e3d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -3397,7 +3397,6 @@ struct bpf_udp_iter_state {
>   	unsigned int max_sk;
>   	int offset;
>   	struct sock **batch;
> -	bool st_bucket_done;
>   };
>   
>   static int bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter,
> @@ -3418,7 +3417,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_udp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
>   	resume_offset = iter->offset;
>   
>   	/* The current batch is done, so advance the bucket. */
> -	if (iter->st_bucket_done)
> +	if (iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk)
>   		state->bucket++;

I think the very first bucket will be skipped.

>   
>   	udptable = udp_get_table_seq(seq, net);
> @@ -3433,7 +3432,6 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_udp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
>   	 */
>   	iter->cur_sk = 0;
>   	iter->end_sk = 0;
> -	iter->st_bucket_done = true;
>   	batch_sks = 0;
>   
>   	for (; state->bucket <= udptable->mask; state->bucket++) {
> @@ -3596,8 +3594,10 @@ static int bpf_iter_udp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>   
>   static void bpf_iter_udp_put_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter)
>   {
> -	while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
> -		sock_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
> +	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
> +
> +	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
> +		sock_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
>   }
>   
>   static void bpf_iter_udp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> @@ -3613,10 +3613,8 @@ static void bpf_iter_udp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>   			(void)udp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, 0, 0);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
> +	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
>   		bpf_iter_udp_put_batch(iter);
> -		iter->st_bucket_done = false;
> -	}
>   }
>   
>   static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_udp_seq_ops = {


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-01 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-28 18:00 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/7] bpf: udp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/7] bpf: udp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/7] bpf: udp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 3/7] bpf: udp: Get rid of st_bucket_done Jordan Rife
2025-05-01 18:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 4/7] bpf: udp: Use bpf_udp_iter_batch_item for bpf_udp_iter_state batch items Jordan Rife
2025-05-01 18:54   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-02 16:08     ` Jordan Rife
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: udp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
2025-05-01 18:51   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-02 16:10     ` Jordan Rife
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: Return socket cookies from sock_iter_batch progs Jordan Rife
2025-04-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in UDP socket iterators Jordan Rife
2025-05-01 19:00   ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fc1f65c-d950-42a5-b3d2-8e7adfcb4d45@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jordan@jrife.io \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox