BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix accessing bpf_sysctl.file_pos on s390
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 23:01:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515ad8ab-9ded-5573-b2c5-37ee9c23dd6e@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190815112044.38420-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>



On 8/15/19 4:20 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> "ctx:file_pos sysctl:read write ok" fails on s390 with "Read value  !=
> nux". This is because verifier rewrites a complete 32-bit
> bpf_sysctl.file_pos update to a partial update of the first 32 bits of
> 64-bit *bpf_sysctl_kern.ppos, which is not correct on big-endian
> systems.
> 
> Fix by using an offset on big-endian systems.
> 
> Ditto for bpf_sysctl.file_pos reads. Currently the test does not detect
> a problem there, since it expects to see 0, which it gets with high
> probability in error cases, so change it to seek to offset 3 and expect
> 3 in bpf_sysctl.file_pos.
> 
> Fixes: e1550bfe0de4 ("bpf: Add file_pos field to bpf_sysctl ctx")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/filter.h                    | 10 ++++++++++
>   kernel/bpf/cgroup.c                       |  9 +++++++--
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c |  9 ++++++++-
>   3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index 92c6e31fb008..94e81c56d81c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -760,6 +760,16 @@ bpf_ctx_narrow_load_shift(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default)
>   #endif
>   }
>   
> +static inline s16
> +bpf_ctx_narrow_access_offset(size_t variable_size, size_t access_size)
> +{
> +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
> +	return 0;
> +#else
> +	return variable_size - access_size;
> +#endif
> +}

The change looks correct to me.
But now in include/linux/filter.h we have to macros:

static inline u8
bpf_ctx_narrow_load_shift(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default)
{
         u8 load_off = off & (size_default - 1);

#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
         return load_off * 8;
#else
         return (size_default - (load_off + size)) * 8;
#endif
}

static inline s16
bpf_ctx_narrow_access_offset(size_t variable_size, size_t access_size)
{
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
         return 0;
#else
         return variable_size - access_size;
#endif
}

It would be good if we can have ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN only in one place.
How about something like below:

static inline u8
bpf_ctx_narrow_access_offset(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default)
{
         u8 access_off = off & (size_default - 1);

#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
         return access_off;
#else
         return size_default - (access_off + size);
#endif
}

static inline u8
bpf_ctx_narrow_load_shift(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default)
{
         return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_offset(off, size, size_default) * 8;
}

> +
>   #define bpf_ctx_wide_access_ok(off, size, type, field)			\
>   	(size == sizeof(__u64) &&					\
>   	off >= offsetof(type, field) &&					\
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index 0a00eaca6fae..b835fbb13ea8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -1356,7 +1356,9 @@ static u32 sysctl_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
>   				treg, si->dst_reg,
>   				offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl_kern, ppos));
>   			*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(
> -				BPF_SIZEOF(u32), treg, si->src_reg, 0);
> +				BPF_SIZEOF(u32), treg, si->src_reg,
> +				bpf_ctx_narrow_access_offset(
> +					sizeof(loff_t), sizeof(u32)));
>   			*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(
>   				BPF_DW, treg, si->dst_reg,
>   				offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl_kern, tmp_reg));
> @@ -1366,7 +1368,10 @@ static u32 sysctl_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
>   				si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
>   				offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl_kern, ppos));
>   			*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(
> -				BPF_SIZE(si->code), si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg, 0);
> +				BPF_SIZE(si->code), si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
> +				bpf_ctx_narrow_access_offset(
> +					sizeof(loff_t),
> +					bpf_size_to_bytes(BPF_SIZE(si->code))));
>   		}
>   		*target_size = sizeof(u32);
>   		break;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
> index a3bebd7c68dd..abc26248a7f1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct sysctl_test {
>   	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>   	const char *sysctl;
>   	int open_flags;
> +	int seek;
>   	const char *newval;
>   	const char *oldval;
>   	enum {
> @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
>   			/* If (file_pos == X) */
>   			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
>   				    offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, file_pos)),
> -			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0, 2),
> +			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 3, 2),
>   
>   			/* return ALLOW; */
>   			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
> @@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
>   		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SYSCTL,
>   		.sysctl = "kernel/ostype",
>   		.open_flags = O_RDONLY,
> +		.seek = 3,
>   		.result = SUCCESS,
>   	},
>   	{
> @@ -1442,6 +1444,11 @@ static int access_sysctl(const char *sysctl_path,
>   	if (fd < 0)
>   		return fd;
>   
> +	if (test->seek && lseek(fd, test->seek, SEEK_SET) == -1) {
> +		log_err("lseek(%d) failed", test->seek);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (test->open_flags == O_RDONLY) {
>   		char buf[128];
>   
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-15 11:20 [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix accessing bpf_sysctl.file_pos on s390 Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-08-15 19:58 ` Andrey Ignatov
2019-08-15 23:01 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2019-08-16 10:34   ` Ilya Leoshkevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=515ad8ab-9ded-5573-b2c5-37ee9c23dd6e@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox