From: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
To: "Daniel Müller" <deso@posteo.net>
Cc: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"andrii@kernel.org" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Maintain selftest configuration in-tree
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 23:14:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518BDA5D-DA78-4BD0-8C96-536ADCCC37AA@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42352041-E158-4440-AF7A-E07CA1E932BD@fb.com>
Hey Daniel,
While each patch in series shows v3, the cover latter subject still shows v2, although description shows v2 -> v3 changes. This also explains why CI showed v2 version in PR. Something to check in your setup.
Regards,
Mykola
> On Jul 26, 2022, at 4:04 PM, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 1:11 PM, Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> wrote:
>>
>> BPF selftests mandate certain kernel configuration options to be present in
>> order to pass. Currently the "reference" config files containing these options
>> are hosted in a separate repository [0]. From there they are picked up by the
>> BPF continuous integration system as well as the in-tree vmtest.sh helper
>> script, which allows for running tests in a VM-based setup locally.
>>
>> But it gets worse, as "BPF CI" is really two CI systems: one for libbpf
>> (mentioned above) and one for the bpf-next kernel repository (or more precisely:
>> family of repositories, as bpf-rc is using the system). As such, we have an
>> additional -- and slightly divergent -- copy of these configurations.
>>
>> This patch set proposes the merging of said configurations into this repository.
>> Doing so provides several benefits:
>> 1) the vmtest.sh script is now self-contained, no longer requiring to pull
>> configurations over the network
>> 2) we can have a single copy of these configurations, eliminating the
>> maintenance burden of keeping two versions in-sync
>> 3) the kernel tree is the place where most development happens, so it is the
>> most natural to adjust configurations as changes are proposed there, as
>> opposed to out-of-tree, where they would always remain an afterthought
>>
>> The patch set is structured in such a way that we first integrate the external
>> configuration [0] and then adjust the vmtest.sh script to pick up the local
>> configuration instead of reaching out to GitHub.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/tree/20f03302350a4143825cedcbd210c4d7112c1898/travis-ci/vmtest/configs
>>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - removed seven more options from s390x configuration that overlapped with
>> pre-existing config
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - minimized imported kernel configs and made them build on top of existing
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
>> - moved them directly into tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>> - sorted and cleaned up tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
>> - removed "selftests/bpf: Integrate vmtest configs" from patch set
>> - removed 4.9 & 5.5 configs
>>
>> Daniel Müller (3):
>> selftests/bpf: Sort configuration
>> selftests/bpf: Copy over libbpf configs
>> selftests/bpf: Adjust vmtest.sh to use local kernel configuration
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST | 6 +
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 67 ++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 101 ++++-----
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.s390x | 147 ++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.x86_64 | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh | 51 +++--
>> 6 files changed, 554 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.s390x
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.x86_64
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>
> Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-26 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 20:11 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Maintain selftest configuration in-tree Daniel Müller
2022-07-26 20:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] selftests/bpf: Sort configuration Daniel Müller
2022-07-26 20:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] selftests/bpf: Copy over libbpf configs Daniel Müller
2022-07-26 20:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Adjust vmtest.sh to use local kernel configuration Daniel Müller
2022-07-26 23:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Maintain selftest configuration in-tree Mykola Lysenko
2022-07-26 23:14 ` Mykola Lysenko [this message]
2022-07-26 23:59 ` Daniel Müller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-19 18:02 Daniel Müller
2022-07-22 6:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=518BDA5D-DA78-4BD0-8C96-536ADCCC37AA@fb.com \
--to=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deso@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox