From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,
shuah@kernel.org, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf: store both map ptr and state in bpf_insn_aux_data
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:36:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554a923f-3f3a-42e5-825a-7a563a2dbf0e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405025536.18113-2-lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
On 4/4/24 7:55 PM, Philo Lu wrote:
> Currently, bpf_insn_aux_data->map_ptr_state is used to store either
> map_ptr or its poison state (i.e., BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON). Thus
> BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON must be checked before reading map_ptr. In certain
> cases, we may need valid map_ptr even in case of poison state.
> This will be explained in next patch with bpf_for_each_map_elem()
> helper.
>
> This patch changes map_ptr_state into a new struct including both map
> pointer and its state (poison/unpriv). It's in the same union with
> struct bpf_loop_inline_state, so there is no extra memory overhead.
> Besides, macros BPF_MAP_PTR_UNPRIV/BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON/BPF_MAP_PTR are no
> longer needed.
>
> This patch does not change any existing functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 2:55 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] bpf: allow bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper with different input maps Philo Lu
2024-04-05 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf: store both map ptr and state in bpf_insn_aux_data Philo Lu
2024-04-05 16:36 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-04-05 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/3] bpf: allow invoking bpf_for_each_map_elem with different maps Philo Lu
2024-04-05 16:37 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() " Philo Lu
2024-04-05 16:39 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 17:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-05 17:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-04-05 17:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-05 17:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] bpf: allow bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper with different input maps patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554a923f-3f3a-42e5-825a-7a563a2dbf0e@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox