From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
emil@etsalapatis.com, shuah@kernel.org, mmullins@fb.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:00:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559673fc207097ecd08f1d7e9f684fe1e9f2a581.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703035137.109608-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 20:51 -0700, Sun Jian wrote:
> The verifier rejects variable offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF
> accesses, but it currently accepts a constant negative offset produced by
> pointer arithmetic.
>
> For example, a raw tracepoint writable program can load ctx[0] as a
> PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER, move it by -8, and then read from the adjusted pointer.
> The register is still tracked as tp_buffer(imm=-8), but the access is
> before the tracepoint writable buffer base and should be rejected.
>
> Check the signed effective buffer offset before updating max_tp_access or
> other buffer max access accounting. Reject negative effective offsets and
> use the checked end offset for max access accounting.
>
> Add a verifier test that rejects a raw tracepoint writable program using a
> negative constant offset.
>
> Fixes: 9df1c28bb752 ("bpf: add writable context for raw tracepoints")
> Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
> ---
The commit 9df1c28bb752 ("bpf: add writable context for raw tracepoints")
delays the tracepoint buffer access to the attach time:
int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link)
{
...
if (prog->aux->max_tp_access > btp->writable_size)
return -EINVAL;
...
}
Called from syscall.c:bpf_raw_tp_link_attach().
Please modify the test case such that it exercises the attachment logic.
Also, please keep selftests in a separate patch and make use of the
full 100 characters line width limit.
pw-bot: cr.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 3:51 [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers Sun Jian
2026-07-06 20:00 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-07-07 6:52 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559673fc207097ecd08f1d7e9f684fe1e9f2a581.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mmullins@fb.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox