public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	 maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, puranjay@kernel.org,
	jakub@cloudflare.com,  pulehui@huawei.com,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for tailcall hierarchy fixing
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 19:01:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5665eb1f4217948a3a06b6898762abf719f141cd.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240623161528.68946-4-hffilwlqm@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 00:15 +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
> Add some test cases to confirm the tailcall hierarchy issue has been fixed.
> 
> On x64, the selftests result is:
> 
> cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf && ./test_progs -t tailcalls
> 327/18  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_1:OK
> 327/19  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry:OK
> 327/20  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fexit:OK
> 327/21  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_fexit:OK
> 327/22  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_entry:OK
> 327/23  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_2:OK
> 327/24  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3:OK
> 327     tailcalls:OK
> Summary: 1/24 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> On arm64, the selftests result is:
> 
> cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf && ./test_progs -t tailcalls
> 327/18  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_1:OK
> 327/19  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry:OK
> 327/20  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fexit:OK
> 327/21  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_fexit:OK
> 327/22  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_entry:OK
> 327/23  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_2:OK
> 327/24  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3:OK
> 327     tailcalls:OK
> Summary: 1/24 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
> ---

Nitpick:
I think that test cases *_hierarchy_{2,3} could be rewritten as
example by this link:
https://gist.github.com/eddyz87/af9b50d0ff3802b43f0e148591790017
It uses test_loader.c machinery, you can use RUN_TESTS macro from any
prog_tests/*.c file to run test cases from a specific binary file.

Otherwise these test cases look good to me.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-23 16:15 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Fix tailcall hierarchy Leon Hwang
2024-06-23 16:15 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] bpf, x64: " Leon Hwang
2024-07-11  0:15   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-11  2:02     ` Leon Hwang
2024-06-23 16:15 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] bpf, arm64: " Leon Hwang
2024-06-26 12:05   ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-06-23 16:15 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for tailcall hierarchy fixing Leon Hwang
2024-07-11  2:01   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-07-11 14:36     ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5665eb1f4217948a3a06b6898762abf719f141cd.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox