Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: validate jit behaviour for tail calls

Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15T22:19:18Z

On Thu, 2024-08-15 at 15:14 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

[...]

> It is already special with a different flavor of regex. And I assume
> we won't have that many jit-testing tests, so yeah, could be adjusted,
> if necessary. But just in general, while __msg() works with large
> verifier logs, __jit() is much more narrow-focused, so even if it
> behaves differently from __msg() I don't really see much difference.
>
> But we also have __xlated() with similar semantics, so I'd say we
> should keep __jit() and __xlated() behaving similarly.

Ok, makes sense.