From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org, sdf@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/8] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms.
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:10:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a05613a-a346-1072-bbab-3494cf231961@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308005050.255859-9-kuifeng@meta.com>
On 3/7/23 4:50 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> Create a pair of sockets that utilize the congestion control algorithm
> under a particular name. Then switch up this congestion control
> algorithm to another implementation and check whether newly created
> connections using the same cc name now run the new implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 38 ++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> index e980188d4124..caaa9175ee36 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include "bpf_dctcp.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_cubic.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_tcp_nogpl.skel.h"
> +#include "tcp_ca_update.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_dctcp_release.skel.h"
> #include "tcp_ca_write_sk_pacing.skel.h"
> #include "tcp_ca_incompl_cong_ops.skel.h"
> @@ -381,6 +382,41 @@ static void test_unsupp_cong_op(void)
> libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn);
> }
>
> +static void test_update_ca(void)
> +{
> + struct tcp_ca_update *skel;
> + struct bpf_link *link;
> + int saved_ca1_cnt;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = tcp_ca_update__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = tcp_ca_update__load(skel);
nit. Use tcp_ca_update__open_and_load().
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load")) {
> + tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
> + ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
> +
> + do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
> + saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
> + ASSERT_GT(saved_ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
> +
> + err = bpf_link__update_map(link, skel->maps.ca_update_2);
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "update_struct_ops");
> +
> + do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
> + ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
> +
> + bpf_link__destroy(link);
> + tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> void test_bpf_tcp_ca(void)
> {
> if (test__start_subtest("dctcp"))
> @@ -399,4 +435,6 @@ void test_bpf_tcp_ca(void)
> test_incompl_cong_ops();
> if (test__start_subtest("unsupp_cong_op"))
> test_unsupp_cong_op();
> + if (test__start_subtest("update_ca"))
> + test_update_ca();
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..36a04be95df5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +int ca1_cnt = 0;
> +int ca2_cnt = 0;
> +
> +#define USEC_PER_SEC 1000000UL
Not used.
> +
> +#define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
Not used.
> +
> +static inline struct tcp_sock *tcp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return (struct tcp_sock *)sk;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_1_cong_control")
> +void BPF_PROG(ca_update_1_cong_control, struct sock *sk,
> + const struct rate_sample *rs)
> +{
> + ca1_cnt++;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_2_cong_control")
> +void BPF_PROG(ca_update_2_cong_control, struct sock *sk,
> + const struct rate_sample *rs)
> +{
> + ca2_cnt++;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_ssthresh")
> +__u32 BPF_PROG(ca_update_ssthresh, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_ssthresh;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_undo_cwnd")
> +__u32 BPF_PROG(ca_update_undo_cwnd, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_cwnd;
> +}
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_update_1 = {
> + .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_1_cong_control,
> + .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
> + .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
> + .name = "tcp_ca_update",
> +};
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_update_2 = {
> + .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_2_cong_control,
nit. I think it is more future proof to use '.init' to bump the ca1_cnt and
ca2_cnt. '.init' must be called. Just in case for some unlikely stack change
that may not call cong_control and then need to adjust the test accordingly.
It also needs a few negative tests like creating a link with a map without
BPF_F_LINK. delete_elem on BPF_F_LINK map. Replace a link with a different
tcp-cc-name which is not supported now, ...etc.
> + .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
> + .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
> + .name = "tcp_ca_update",
> +};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 0:50 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/8] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/8] bpf: Retire the struct_ops map kvalue->refcnt Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 18:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 22:30 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/8] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 18:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 22:51 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 15:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-08 15:32 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-08 16:03 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-08 20:04 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 23:46 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/8] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 21:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-09 0:22 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-09 17:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-09 18:16 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-09 18:19 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/8] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 22:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-09 3:09 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/8] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 22:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/8] libbpf: Use .struct_ops.link section to indicate a struct_ops with a link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 0:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/8] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-08 23:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-03-09 3:34 ` Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a05613a-a346-1072-bbab-3494cf231961@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox