bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:42:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d7d1ff3-14cd-4c18-a180-3c99e784bbeb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725214401.1475224-6-samitolvanen@google.com>



On 7/25/25 2:44 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> While running BPF self-tests with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG (Clang Control
> Flow Integrity) enabled, I ran into a couple of CFI failures
> in bpf_obj_free_fields() caused by type mismatches between
> the btf_dtor_kfunc_t function pointer type and the registered
> destructor functions.
>
> It looks like we can't change the argument type for these
> functions to match btf_dtor_kfunc_t because the verifier doesn't
> like void pointer arguments for functions used in BPF programs,
> so this series fixes the issue by adding stubs with correct types
> to use as destructors for each instance of this I found in the
> kernel tree.
>
> The last patch changes btf_check_dtor_kfuncs() to enforce the
> function type when CFI is enabled, so we don't end up registering
> destructors that panic the kernel. Perhaps this is something we
> could enforce even without CONFIG_CFI_CLANG?
>
> Sami
>
> ---
> v2:
> - Annotated the stubs with CFI_NOSEAL to fix issues with IBT
>    sealing on x86.
> - Changed __bpf_kfunc to explicit __used __retain.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250724223225.1481960-6-samitolvanen@google.com/
>
> ---
> Sami Tolvanen (4):
>    bpf: crypto: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
>    bpf: net_sched: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
>    selftests/bpf: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
>    bpf, btf: Enforce destructor kfunc type with CFI
>
>   kernel/bpf/btf.c                                     | 7 +++++++
>   kernel/bpf/crypto.c                                  | 9 ++++++++-
>   net/sched/bpf_qdisc.c                                | 9 ++++++++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 9 ++++++++-
>   4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 95993dc3039e29dabb9a50d074145d4cb757b08b

With this patch set and no CONFIG_CFI_CLANG in .config,
the bpf selftests work okay. In bpf ci, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
is not enabled.

But if enabling CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, this patch set fixed
./test_progs run issue, but there are some test failures
like

===
test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000d581 - ffffffffa000d558 > 39
processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
#32/186  btf/line_info (No subprog):FAIL

test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000dee5 - ffffffffa000debc > 39
processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
#32/189  btf/line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info:FAIL

...

test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000e069 - ffffffffa000e040 > 38
processed 9 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 0
#32/202  btf/line_info (dead subprog + dead start w/ move):FAIL
#32      btf:FAIL
===

The failure probably not related to this patch, but rather related
to CONFIG_CFI_CLANG itself. I will debug this separately.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-25 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-25 21:44 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] bpf: crypto: Use the correct destructor kfunc type Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 23:11   ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-28 18:18     ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: net_sched: " Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: " Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf, btf: Enforce destructor kfunc type with CFI Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 23:37   ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-25 23:42 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-07-28 18:21   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types Sami Tolvanen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d7d1ff3-14cd-4c18-a180-3c99e784bbeb@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).