From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-177.mta0.migadu.com (out-177.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E177A1B9831 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 02:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757643623; cv=none; b=VU1BNu5tCdmA6fqw6eMoTrYWhaXV8OE86PyPJ8347hgsR6UgOViisxI1Tlb6GsAy9qZ7eRb2dQPQrjt54/4Lz9ssl+xo3KW29ZkfK6LwEgUQGfcbmZeKqRzLuRralnWrFEqUNc3qK3NObqfDwgI26aLjjI4PFWkt23kRFVW/Vcg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757643623; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p+gxHO53waJQunVWU6cFWzvdXoFDgddiT35lud4RgGE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=L8TdFZCsln9Aqh901LmxNCFylG3Z3QJRVFXs1EHIPJVNcHiQiPlfkU6dWCBhscXH1rIRsXlwL3R6Lcv9slSOA5BUlugfxTgCTbTqoWswiFZl7bMqbStn10MRZok7WSLi3wqrUbSt5vJral0tmD+QcUnP8NRqh5rF8YM+IgiJzWE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=t3YSVxm/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="t3YSVxm/" Message-ID: <665f4b63-1296-430c-8979-77d5b7e60f2a@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1757643616; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LMhhaw5/O4AgHaGkwCJ3YhRvRCghWKGnqLN018HYmS0=; b=t3YSVxm/sBxS5fIvn2ELoCquZfzlgHYV7MG0gVftfUekMR6a3It9SRPBxFTlliPb3Wx03x hzY5WrLHtG7c0+FY9AdLRBo7gvVZUgArPQvV18/MbeTUZol5Xrq4ENg9zyUw7t7yAX7F+I xJ5JiuOo9GRKoMT2xNgboL0UKAqPxOs= Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:20:06 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Content-Language: en-US To: Alexei Starovoitov , Ihor Solodrai Cc: Peilin Ye , Eduard Zingerman , bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Josh Don , Barret Rhoden References: <20250908044025.77519-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> <20250908044025.77519-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev> <603b37f4ef1a3ccbb661eaf11f56da9144bdcb66.camel@gmail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Leon Hwang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 12/9/25 00:38, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM Leon Hwang wrote: >>> >>> >>> If I respin the patch for the bpf tree, I have to drop the part that >>> skips the timer_interrupt test case. Should I? >> >> of course. > > Leon, > > the fix made it all the way to bpf-next. > Please follow up to silence timer_interrupt test. > > It shouldn't affect CI, since we don't test RT. No problem. Once the fix lands in bpf-next, I’ll test it against RT. After it’s applied, I’ll follow up with a revert of the patch set in order to silence the timer_interrupt test. Thanks, Leon