From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Jiyong Yang <ksur673@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add more tests for loading insn arrays with offsets
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 23:38:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <680e35d1-04bd-403c-9aca-f2b8a0af9af3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401161529.681755-3-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
On 4/1/26 5:15 PM, Anton Protopopov wrote:
> A typical series of load instructions for a gotox looks like
>
> r1 = &map + offset1
> r1 += offset2
> r1 = *(r1 + offset3)
> gotox r1
>
> Here offset3 is, normally, equal to zero; but this is not guaranteed.
> Extend selftests with tests for non-zero offset3 and, while here, also
> add tests for negative offsets (the offset1 and the sum of three offsets
> still have to be non-negative).
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c | 114 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c
> index 75b0cf2467ab..594adf698fdb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static void check_ldimm64_off_load(struct bpf_gotox *skel __always_unused)
>
> static int __check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(struct bpf_insn *insns,
> __u32 insn_cnt,
> - __u32 off1, __u32 off2)
> + int off1, int off2, int off3)
> {
> const __u32 values[] = {5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15};
> const __u32 max_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(values);
> @@ -349,16 +349,46 @@ static int __check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(struct bpf_insn *insns,
> /* r1 += off2 */
> insns[2].imm = off2;
>
> + /* r1 = *(r1 + off3) */
> + insns[3].off = off3;
> +
> ret = prog_load(insns, insn_cnt);
> close(map_fd);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void reject_offsets(struct bpf_insn *insns, __u32 insn_cnt, __u32 off1, __u32 off2)
> +static void
> +allow_offsets(struct bpf_insn *insns, __u32 insn_cnt, int off1, int off2, int off3)
> +{
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
> + int prog_fd, err;
> + char s[128] = "";
> +
> + prog_fd = __check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(insns, insn_cnt, off1, off2, off3);
> + snprintf(s, sizeof(s), "__check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(%u,%u,%u)", off1, off2, off3);
here offsets are int, but printed with %u.
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, s))
> + return;
> +
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) {
> + close(prog_fd);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, (off1 + off2 + off3) / 8, "test_run_opts retval")) {
> + close(prog_fd);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + close(prog_fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +reject_offsets(struct bpf_insn *insns, __u32 insn_cnt, __u32 off1, __u32 off2, __u32 off3)
If offsets can be negative, should these arguments be int rather than
__u32, also matching reject_offsets?
> {
> int prog_fd;
>
> - prog_fd = __check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(insns, insn_cnt, off1, off2);
> + prog_fd = __check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(insns, insn_cnt, off1, off2, off3);
> if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EACCES, "__check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load"))
> close(prog_fd);
> }
> @@ -376,7 +406,7 @@ static void check_ldimm64_off_gotox(struct bpf_gotox *skel __always_unused)
> * The program rewrites the offsets in the instructions below:
> * r1 = &map + offset1
> * r1 += offset2
> - * r1 = *r1
> + * r1 = *(r1 + offset3)
> * gotox r1
> */
> BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW(BPF_REG_1, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE, 0),
> @@ -403,43 +433,45 @@ static void check_ldimm64_off_gotox(struct bpf_gotox *skel __always_unused)
> BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 5),
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> };
> - int prog_fd, err;
> - __u32 off1, off2;
> -
> - /* allow all combinations off1 + off2 < 6 */
> - for (off1 = 0; off1 < 6; off1++) {
> - for (off2 = 0; off1 + off2 < 6; off2++) {
> - LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
> -
> - prog_fd = __check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> - off1 * 8, off2 * 8);
> - if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "__check_ldimm64_gotox_prog_load"))
> - return;
> -
> - err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
> - if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) {
> - close(prog_fd);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (!ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, off1 + off2, "test_run_opts retval")) {
> - close(prog_fd);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - close(prog_fd);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - /* reject off1 + off2 >= 6 */
> - reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, 8 * 3);
> - reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 7, 8 * 0);
> - reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 0, 8 * 7);
> -
> - /* reject (off1 + off2) % 8 != 0 */
> - reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 3, 3);
> - reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 7, 0);
> - reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 0, 7);
> + int off1, off2, off3;
> +
> + /* allow all combinations off1 + off2 + off3 < 6 */
> + for (off1 = 0; off1 < 6; off1++)
> + for (off2 = 0; off1 + off2 < 6; off2++)
> + for (off3 = 0; off1 + off2 + off3 < 6; off3++)
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> + off1 * 8, off2 * 8, off3 * 8);
> +
> + /* allow for some offsets to be negative */
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, 0, -(8 * 3));
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, -(8 * 3), 0);
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 0, 8 * 3, -(8 * 3));
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 4, 0, -(8 * 2));
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 4, -(8 * 2), 0);
> + allow_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 0, 8 * 4, -(8 * 2));
> +
> + /* disallow negative sums of offsets */
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, 0, -(8 * 4));
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, -(8 * 4), 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 0, 8 * 3, -(8 * 4));
> +
> + /* disallow the off1 to be negative in any case */
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), -8 * 1, 0, 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), -8 * 1, 8 * 1, 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), -8 * 1, 8 * 1, 8 * 1);
> +
> + /* reject off1 + off2 + off3 >= 6 */
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, 8 * 3, 8 * 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 7, 8 * 0, 8 * 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 0, 8 * 7, 8 * 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 3, 8 * 0, 8 * 3);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 8 * 0, 8 * 3, 8 * 3);
> +
> + /* reject (off1 + off2) % 8 != 0, off3 % 8 != 0 */
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 3, 3, 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 7, 0, 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 0, 7, 0);
> + reject_offsets(insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), 0, 0, 7);
> }
>
> void test_bpf_gotox(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 16:15 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Properly load values from insn_arays with non-zero offsets Anton Protopopov
2026-04-01 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Do not ignore offsets for loads from insn_arrays Anton Protopopov
2026-04-01 22:47 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
[not found] ` <CAGzPb2Ed+Z513yWDUE91H_OP2eF_fHucy_xV3-cpYOkmw73xmg@mail.gmail.com>
2026-04-02 0:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-02 2:37 ` sun jian
2026-04-02 8:37 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-04-02 8:36 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-04-01 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add more tests for loading insn arrays with offsets Anton Protopopov
2026-04-01 22:38 ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
2026-04-02 8:28 ` Anton Protopopov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=680e35d1-04bd-403c-9aca-f2b8a0af9af3@gmail.com \
--to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ksur673@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox