From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-189.mta0.migadu.com (out-189.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23ED2BA2D for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 05:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.189 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706245950; cv=none; b=Q/Va5EpASgr/hqY20ryXy5iAvSH1fRLYBTaLKvk21Y13xxLNABxjLa7WwCDJlSCygwTchIr2c88x1Gz6QgqCgTOyfR04LlOpOIhZu77T74RrHWDMpH8LU9u7kOdH3Suk80dTpKLusMG9T/kbEkiSzYzpd9WUUWyXCK6Qri+cIik= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706245950; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YcThGL3ya6LgHZTsllu1U6305lplcDWet/H7XFgjp2Q=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RXRNrX1zUqPUN3shmT/xGoJWg3wmFGMzjOrZGHTKCLwrRc4K3aZd/yf1ZzuJXfwrhuSrk3Y6KJf8bowb4cHyHSeRGZY8iRy7y9PyAypefuV2h++TKpG3GmS6nZABa6zAIGSQLfv/MOUUnxIXY5lIeKfGZYtMQH594OTBB08J5Wg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=eAwg1tWu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="eAwg1tWu" Message-ID: <68a15df5-dbb8-481a-812e-2b361dc2a915@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1706245944; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YcThGL3ya6LgHZTsllu1U6305lplcDWet/H7XFgjp2Q=; b=eAwg1tWumUo30cBWqH9icBru2E5Zaz9t9cIlCCyGUu8tSi8TwaWMeZP1aosUdpVVUjwT+D x9FEpG2gVLvxVeLbICPt/dePnRBl6ssxo8nYGSrRDKfVIh6UDHYsKvL9ajPejkqy1IbYkF ocAZPPmje4ItVXnEm/1AFKVlHzxFXU8= Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:16 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions Content-Language: en-GB To: Dave Thaler , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler References: <20240126040050.8464-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: <20240126040050.8464-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 1/25/24 8:00 PM, Dave Thaler wrote: > Clarify definitions of several instructions: > * BPF_NEG does not support BPF_X > * BPF_CALL does not support BPF_JMP32 or BPF_X > * BPF_EXIT does not support BPF_X > * BPF_JA does not support BPF_X (was implied but not explicitly stated) > > Also fix a typo in the wide instruction figure where > the field is actually named "opcode" not "code". > > Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler Acked-by: Yonghong Song From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [50.223.129.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B7BBA2D for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 05:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=50.223.129.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706245957; cv=none; b=jtESuUwgqyYXrjOfRAxRp4cQUVJsxS3/6il0WI+rdmSG1NllLaR/6oFTC2D2GJRmuBKaZT7+j2S02Evz03GDLih/uhhWJu9H36RqkDRyP57gcJm5AaH+wVL/R0JWZvl/+I/3TV3sVKoG1vGykcIpZrQ0XRwwJj5dKPSzz90Gids= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706245957; c=relaxed/simple; bh=So26aDJUZ1cDdXqYccISPZWZ9TZhGMkvnzhRdso6nWQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To: Subject:Content-Type; b=H8EgQyjnWRt8Shdw8dGSL4y6uc4To6JURT3+DNpkteV67mDUCK8WOxxfXDoiOC8YBl3EiD72BPaq5Yn57UKKCD+24EDrXHnt2u8YKMXmdyVFNyc4MDBlg9heUVohdO1sRbGMKQya1jwxH3j6/nWtpoStNZqGg/SROQVRTihraoc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b=KK7xRDRR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b=KK7xRDRR; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=eAwg1tWu reason="signature verification failed"; arc=none smtp.client-ip=50.223.129.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b="KK7xRDRR"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b="KK7xRDRR"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="eAwg1tWu" Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2003C15107F for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1706245953; bh=So26aDJUZ1cDdXqYccISPZWZ9TZhGMkvnzhRdso6nWQ=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=KK7xRDRRrYt+ZDoG1FUNgkm9DVlhlQnCwCbbill6j/MuhV5/NR4AMlXmZ+PfnT64B jRSVcxOYZDqXCu91D21j9uWtyXoHQW1zDdcnNgvgUvsVfhNJrJmoaNEIMCLEFofFSc OlXO3cgy0JV/dw67QA6/KNBnAiZvHHbCQstaIV90= X-Mailbox-Line: From bpf-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jan 25 21:12:33 2024 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D64BC14F703; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1706245953; bh=So26aDJUZ1cDdXqYccISPZWZ9TZhGMkvnzhRdso6nWQ=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=KK7xRDRRrYt+ZDoG1FUNgkm9DVlhlQnCwCbbill6j/MuhV5/NR4AMlXmZ+PfnT64B jRSVcxOYZDqXCu91D21j9uWtyXoHQW1zDdcnNgvgUvsVfhNJrJmoaNEIMCLEFofFSc OlXO3cgy0JV/dw67QA6/KNBnAiZvHHbCQstaIV90= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29710C14F703 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.106 X-Spam-Level: Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ApsD3khSiRKB for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from out-179.mta0.migadu.com (out-179.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE569C14F6B5 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <68a15df5-dbb8-481a-812e-2b361dc2a915@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1706245944; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YcThGL3ya6LgHZTsllu1U6305lplcDWet/H7XFgjp2Q=; b=eAwg1tWumUo30cBWqH9icBru2E5Zaz9t9cIlCCyGUu8tSi8TwaWMeZP1aosUdpVVUjwT+D x9FEpG2gVLvxVeLbICPt/dePnRBl6ssxo8nYGSrRDKfVIh6UDHYsKvL9ajPejkqy1IbYkF ocAZPPmje4ItVXnEm/1AFKVlHzxFXU8= Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:16 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Dave Thaler , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler References: <20240126040050.8464-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: <20240126040050.8464-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions X-BeenThere: bpf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: bpf-bounces@ietf.org Sender: "Bpf" Message-ID: <20240126051216.vs3sgPAIIWj7qUUSkt1qPJKRyguHVESa7w9JYcgws9k@z> On 1/25/24 8:00 PM, Dave Thaler wrote: > Clarify definitions of several instructions: > * BPF_NEG does not support BPF_X > * BPF_CALL does not support BPF_JMP32 or BPF_X > * BPF_EXIT does not support BPF_X > * BPF_JA does not support BPF_X (was implied but not explicitly stated) > > Also fix a typo in the wide instruction figure where > the field is actually named "opcode" not "code". > > Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler Acked-by: Yonghong Song -- Bpf mailing list Bpf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf