BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>,
	ast@kernel.org,  andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com
Cc: zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/10] btf: Verify BTF Sorting
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:48:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6eb163ae1dbe8bb44e47f1c1ebc37de34c6b7df5.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208062353.1702672-8-dolinux.peng@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2025-12-08 at 14:23 +0800, Donglin Peng wrote:
> From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> 
> This patch checks whether the BTF is sorted by name in ascending order.
> If sorted, binary search will be used when looking up types.
> 
> Specifically, vmlinux and kernel module BTFs are always sorted during
> the build phase with anonymous types placed before named types, so we
> only need to identify the starting ID of named types.
> 
> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 842f9c0200e4..925cb524f3a8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,60 @@ u32 btf_nr_types(const struct btf *btf)
>  	return total;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Assuming that types are sorted by name in ascending order.
> + */
> +static int btf_compare_type_names(const void *a, const void *b, void *priv)
> +{
> +	struct btf *btf = (struct btf *)priv;
> +	const struct btf_type *ta = btf_type_by_id(btf, *(__u32 *)a);
> +	const struct btf_type *tb = btf_type_by_id(btf, *(__u32 *)b);
> +	const char *na, *nb;
> +
> +	na = btf_name_by_offset(btf, ta->name_off);
> +	nb = btf_name_by_offset(btf, tb->name_off);
> +	return strcmp(na, nb);
> +}
> +
> +/* Note that vmlinux and kernel module BTFs are always sorted
> + * during the building phase.
> + */
> +static void btf_check_sorted(struct btf *btf)
> +{
> +	const struct btf_type *t;
> +	bool skip_cmp = btf_is_kernel(btf);

Nit: maybe just do a separate loop when btf_is_kernel(btf) == true?

  for (i = 0, n = btf_nr_types(btf); i < n, i++) {
    t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
    if (t->name_off) {
      btf->sorted_start_id = i;
      return;
    }
  }
  return;

> +	u32 sorted_start_id = 0;
> +	int i, n, k = 0;
> +
> +	if (btf->nr_types < 2)
> +		return;
> +
> +	n = btf_nr_types(btf) - 1;
> +	for (i = btf_start_id(btf); i < n; i++) {
> +		k = i + 1;
> +		if (!skip_cmp &&
> +			btf_compare_type_names(&i, &k, btf) > 0)
> +			return;
> +
> +		if (sorted_start_id == 0) {
> +			t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
> +			if (t->name_off) {
> +				sorted_start_id = i;
> +				if (skip_cmp)
> +					break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (sorted_start_id == 0) {
> +		t = btf_type_by_id(btf, k);
> +		if (t->name_off)
> +			sorted_start_id = k;
> +	}
> +	if (sorted_start_id)
> +		btf->sorted_start_id = sorted_start_id;
> +}
> +
>  static s32 btf_find_by_name_bsearch(const struct btf *btf, const char *name,
>  				    s32 start_id, s32 end_id)
>  {
> @@ -5889,6 +5943,8 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uat
>  	if (err)
>  		goto errout;
>  
> +	btf_check_sorted(btf);
> +
>  	struct_meta_tab = btf_parse_struct_metas(&env->log, btf);
>  	if (IS_ERR(struct_meta_tab)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(struct_meta_tab);
> @@ -6296,6 +6352,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_base(struct btf_verifier_env *env, const char *name
>  	if (err)
>  		goto errout;
>  
> +	btf_check_sorted(btf);
>  	refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1);
>  
>  	return btf;
> @@ -6430,6 +6487,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_module(const char *module_name, const void *data,
>  	}
>  
>  	btf_verifier_env_free(env);
> +	btf_check_sorted(btf);
>  	refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1);
>  	return btf;
>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-17  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-08  6:23 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/10] Improve the performance of BTF type lookups with binary search Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/10] libbpf: Add BTF permutation support for type reordering Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 22:00   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-16 22:47     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-17  3:30     ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/10] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for btf__permute functionality Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 22:00   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/10] tools/resolve_btfids: Support BTF sorting feature Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 22:13   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/10] libbpf: Optimize type lookup with binary search for sorted BTF Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 23:38   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-16 23:43     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17  2:46       ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  2:32     ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  2:34       ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  2:57       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/10] libbpf: Verify BTF Sorting Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  0:32   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17  3:19     ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/10] btf: Optimize type lookup with binary search Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/10] btf: Verify BTF Sorting Donglin Peng
2025-12-09  3:21   ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  0:41     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17  0:48   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-12-17  3:26     ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/10] bpf: Skip anonymous types in type lookup for performance Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:36   ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  6:55   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17  9:21     ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 17:29       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-18  9:16         ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/10] bpf: Optimize the performance of find_bpffs_btf_enums Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  6:58   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08  6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/10] libbpf: Optimize the performance of determine_ptr_size Donglin Peng
2025-12-17  7:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17  8:38     ` Donglin Peng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6eb163ae1dbe8bb44e47f1c1ebc37de34c6b7df5.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pengdonglin@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox