From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>,
ast@kernel.org, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com
Cc: zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/10] btf: Verify BTF Sorting
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:48:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6eb163ae1dbe8bb44e47f1c1ebc37de34c6b7df5.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208062353.1702672-8-dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2025-12-08 at 14:23 +0800, Donglin Peng wrote:
> From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
>
> This patch checks whether the BTF is sorted by name in ascending order.
> If sorted, binary search will be used when looking up types.
>
> Specifically, vmlinux and kernel module BTFs are always sorted during
> the build phase with anonymous types placed before named types, so we
> only need to identify the starting ID of named types.
>
> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 842f9c0200e4..925cb524f3a8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,60 @@ u32 btf_nr_types(const struct btf *btf)
> return total;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Assuming that types are sorted by name in ascending order.
> + */
> +static int btf_compare_type_names(const void *a, const void *b, void *priv)
> +{
> + struct btf *btf = (struct btf *)priv;
> + const struct btf_type *ta = btf_type_by_id(btf, *(__u32 *)a);
> + const struct btf_type *tb = btf_type_by_id(btf, *(__u32 *)b);
> + const char *na, *nb;
> +
> + na = btf_name_by_offset(btf, ta->name_off);
> + nb = btf_name_by_offset(btf, tb->name_off);
> + return strcmp(na, nb);
> +}
> +
> +/* Note that vmlinux and kernel module BTFs are always sorted
> + * during the building phase.
> + */
> +static void btf_check_sorted(struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + const struct btf_type *t;
> + bool skip_cmp = btf_is_kernel(btf);
Nit: maybe just do a separate loop when btf_is_kernel(btf) == true?
for (i = 0, n = btf_nr_types(btf); i < n, i++) {
t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
if (t->name_off) {
btf->sorted_start_id = i;
return;
}
}
return;
> + u32 sorted_start_id = 0;
> + int i, n, k = 0;
> +
> + if (btf->nr_types < 2)
> + return;
> +
> + n = btf_nr_types(btf) - 1;
> + for (i = btf_start_id(btf); i < n; i++) {
> + k = i + 1;
> + if (!skip_cmp &&
> + btf_compare_type_names(&i, &k, btf) > 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (sorted_start_id == 0) {
> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, i);
> + if (t->name_off) {
> + sorted_start_id = i;
> + if (skip_cmp)
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (sorted_start_id == 0) {
> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, k);
> + if (t->name_off)
> + sorted_start_id = k;
> + }
> + if (sorted_start_id)
> + btf->sorted_start_id = sorted_start_id;
> +}
> +
> static s32 btf_find_by_name_bsearch(const struct btf *btf, const char *name,
> s32 start_id, s32 end_id)
> {
> @@ -5889,6 +5943,8 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uat
> if (err)
> goto errout;
>
> + btf_check_sorted(btf);
> +
> struct_meta_tab = btf_parse_struct_metas(&env->log, btf);
> if (IS_ERR(struct_meta_tab)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(struct_meta_tab);
> @@ -6296,6 +6352,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_base(struct btf_verifier_env *env, const char *name
> if (err)
> goto errout;
>
> + btf_check_sorted(btf);
> refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1);
>
> return btf;
> @@ -6430,6 +6487,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_module(const char *module_name, const void *data,
> }
>
> btf_verifier_env_free(env);
> + btf_check_sorted(btf);
> refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1);
> return btf;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 6:23 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/10] Improve the performance of BTF type lookups with binary search Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/10] libbpf: Add BTF permutation support for type reordering Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 22:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-16 22:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-17 3:30 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/10] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for btf__permute functionality Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 22:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/10] tools/resolve_btfids: Support BTF sorting feature Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 22:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/10] libbpf: Optimize type lookup with binary search for sorted BTF Donglin Peng
2025-12-16 23:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-16 23:43 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 2:46 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 2:32 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 2:34 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 2:57 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/10] libbpf: Verify BTF Sorting Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 0:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 3:19 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/10] btf: Optimize type lookup with binary search Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/10] btf: Verify BTF Sorting Donglin Peng
2025-12-09 3:21 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 0:41 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 0:48 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-12-17 3:26 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/10] bpf: Skip anonymous types in type lookup for performance Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:36 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 6:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 9:21 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 17:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-18 9:16 ` Donglin Peng
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/10] bpf: Optimize the performance of find_bpffs_btf_enums Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 6:58 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-08 6:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/10] libbpf: Optimize the performance of determine_ptr_size Donglin Peng
2025-12-17 7:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 8:38 ` Donglin Peng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6eb163ae1dbe8bb44e47f1c1ebc37de34c6b7df5.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pengdonglin@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox