From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V7 2/8] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:44:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f9cac4e-a231-ff8d-43a5-828995ca5ec7@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160588909693.2817268.17116187979657760922.stgit@firesoul>
On 11/20/20 5:18 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> BPF end-user on Cilium slack-channel (Carlo Carraro) wants to use
> bpf_fib_lookup for doing MTU-check, but *prior* to extending packet size,
> by adjusting fib_params 'tot_len' with the packet length plus the
> expected encap size. (Just like the bpf_check_mtu helper supports). He
> discovered that for SKB ctx the param->tot_len was not used, instead
> skb->len was used (via MTU check in is_skb_forwardable()).
>
> Fix this by using fib_params 'tot_len' for MTU check. If not provided
> (e.g. zero) then keep existing behaviour intact.
>
> Fixes: 4c79579b44b1 ("bpf: Change bpf_fib_lookup to return lookup status")
> Reported-by: Carlo Carraro <colrack@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 1ee97fdeea64..84d77c425fbe 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -5565,11 +5565,21 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb,
> #endif
> }
>
> - if (!rc) {
> + if (rc == BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_SUCCESS) {
> struct net_device *dev;
> + u32 mtu;
>
> dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, params->ifindex);
> - if (!is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb))
> + mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu);
> +
> + /* Using tot_len for (L3) MTU check if provided by user */
> + if (params->tot_len && params->tot_len > mtu)
> + rc = BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;
Is there a reason why we cannot reuse and at the same time optimize the built-in
bpf_ipv{4,6}_fib_lookup() check_mtu as we do in XDP when params->tot_len was
specified.. something as presented earlier [0]? My biggest concern for gso skbs
is that the above might be subject to breakage from one kernel version to another
if it was filled from the packet. So going back and building upon [0], to be on
safe side we could have a new flag like below to indicate wanted behavior:
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c3458ec1f30a..d3cd2f47f011 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4934,8 +4934,9 @@ struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args {
* OUTPUT: Do lookup from egress perspective; default is ingress
*/
enum {
- BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT = (1U << 0),
- BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT = (1U << 1),
+ BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT = (1U << 0),
+ BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT = (1U << 1),
+ BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_ALWAYS_MTU_CHECK = (1U << 2),
};
enum {
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 2ca5eecebacf..4fb876ebd6a0 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5547,37 +5547,27 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_fib_lookup_proto = {
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb,
struct bpf_fib_lookup *, params, int, plen, u32, flags)
{
- struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
- int rc = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+ bool check_mtu = !skb_is_gso(skb) ||
+ (flags & BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_ALWAYS_MTU_CHECK);
if (plen < sizeof(*params))
return -EINVAL;
- if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT))
+ if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT |
+ BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_ALWAYS_MTU_CHECK))
return -EINVAL;
switch (params->family) {
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
case AF_INET:
- rc = bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, false);
- break;
+ return bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, check_mtu);
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
case AF_INET6:
- rc = bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, false);
- break;
+ return bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, check_mtu);
#endif
}
-
- if (!rc) {
- struct net_device *dev;
-
- dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, params->ifindex);
- if (!is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb))
- rc = BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;
- }
-
- return rc;
+ return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
}
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_skb_fib_lookup_proto = {
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/65d8f988-5b41-24c2-8501-7cbbddb1238e@iogearbox.net/
> + /* Notice at this TC cls_bpf level skb->len contains L2 size,
> + * but is_skb_forwardable takes that into account
> + */
> + if (params->tot_len == 0 && !is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb))
> rc = BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;
> }
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 16:18 [PATCH bpf-next V7 0/8] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 1/8] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 2/8] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-02 21:44 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2020-12-02 22:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 3/8] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 4/8] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-03 18:25 ` sdf
2020-12-14 11:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 5/8] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 6/8] bpf: make it possible to identify BPF redirected SKBs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 7/8] selftests/bpf: use bpf_check_mtu in selftest test_cls_redirect Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 8/8] bpf/selftests: activating bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 21:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-21 7:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-24 14:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-24 16:50 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f9cac4e-a231-ff8d-43a5-828995ca5ec7@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=colrack@gmail.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaun@tigera.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox