From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>,
Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V3] bpf: use -Wno-address-of-packed-member in some selftests
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 08:15:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fb7e648-4eef-418f-b156-5bce5d3bbb32@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206102330.7113-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
On 2/6/24 2:23 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> [Differences from V2:
> - Remove conditionals in the source files pragmas, as the
> pragma is supported by both GCC and clang.]
>
> Both GCC and clang implement the -Wno-address-of-packed-member
> warning, which is enabled by -Wall, that warns about taking the
> address of a packed struct field when it can lead to an "unaligned"
> address.
>
> This triggers the following errors (-Werror) when building three
> particular BPF selftests with GCC:
>
> progs/test_cls_redirect.c
> 986 | if (ipv4_is_fragment((void *)&encap->ip)) {
> progs/test_cls_redirect_dynptr.c
> 410 | pkt_ipv4_checksum((void *)&encap_gre->ip);
> progs/test_cls_redirect.c
> 521 | pkt_ipv4_checksum((void *)&encap_gre->ip);
> progs/test_tc_tunnel.c
> 232 | set_ipv4_csum((void *)&h_outer.ip);
>
> These warnings do not signal any real problem in the tests as far as I
> can see.
>
> This patch adds pragmas to these test files that inhibit the
> -Waddress-of-packed-member warning.
>
> Tested in bpf-next master.
> No regressions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>
> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>
> Cc: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-06 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 10:23 [PATCH bpf-next V3] bpf: use -Wno-address-of-packed-member in some selftests Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-06 16:15 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-02-06 17:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fb7e648-4eef-418f-b156-5bce5d3bbb32@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=yhs@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox