From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:06:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <704f1950a3ab0a941fe673930086afeae0d6147d.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLZh4Bk++vEW97mL0mMCUJu075vQFS2Kkhf9zXP5b2zLw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2026-02-11 at 18:23 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 2:32 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > - In mark_ptr_or_null_reg() WARN_ON_ONCE() checks were removed
> > because in some cases helpers that return local kptrs can now
> > return pointers with non-zero '.var_off' (e.g., a pointer to
> > a spin lock inside a map entry).
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -17129,29 +17074,13 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_func_state *state,
> > {
> > if (type_may_be_null(reg->type) && reg->id == id &&
> > (is_rcu_reg(reg) || !WARN_ON_ONCE(!reg->id))) {
> > - /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should have been
> > - * known-zero, because we don't allow pointer arithmetic on
> > - * pointers that might be NULL. If we see this happening, don't
> > - * convert the register.
> > - *
> > - * But in some cases, some helpers that return local kptrs
> > - * advance offset for the returned pointer. In those cases, it
> > - * is fine to expect to see reg->off.
> > - */
> > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg->smin_value || reg->smax_value || !tnum_equals_const(reg-
> > >var_off, 0)))
> > - return;
> > - if (!(type_is_ptr_alloc_obj(reg->type) || type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type)) &&
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(reg->off))
> > - return;
> > -
>
> This part looks overly aggressive to me.
> I don't remember seeing these warns, so any known code or syzbot
> is not triggering it, but can we keep them?
> The first warn can stay as-is, no?
> And the 2nd can be converted to tnum_equals_const() too ?
I think it can be preserved as one warning:
if (!(type_is_ptr_alloc_obj(reg->type) || type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type)) &&
WARN_ON_ONCE(!tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, 0)))
return;
I'll add this in v2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-12 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 22:31 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: consolidate pointer offset tracking in var_off Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-11 22:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: split check_reg_sane_offset() in two parts Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-11 22:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-12 2:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-12 5:06 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-02-11 22:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf: rename bpf_reg_state->off to bpf_reg_state->delta Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-11 23:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-11 23:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-02-12 3:06 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-12 8:15 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-12 8:15 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=704f1950a3ab0a941fe673930086afeae0d6147d.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox