public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: tunnel: add sanity test for checksums
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:21:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7372590a-f40b-17d1-f780-3bd1ce4f30bb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221220004701.402165-2-kuba@kernel.org>

On 12/19/22 4:47 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Simple netdevsim based test. Netdevsim will validate xmit'ed
> packets, in particular we care about checksum sanity (along
> the lines of checks inside skb_checksum_help()). Triggering
> skb_checksum_help() directly would require the right HW device
> or a crypto device setup, netdevsim is much simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c                |  5 ++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tc_tunnel.sh | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> index 6db6a75ff9b9..e4808a6d37a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,11 @@ static netdev_tx_t nsim_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>   	if (!nsim_ipsec_tx(ns, skb))
>   		goto out;
>   
> +	/* Validate the packet */
> +	if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned int)skb_checksum_start_offset(skb) >=
> +			     skb_headlen(skb));
> +
>   	u64_stats_update_begin(&ns->syncp);
>   	ns->tx_packets++;
>   	ns->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tc_tunnel.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tc_tunnel.sh
> index 334bdfeab940..4dac87f6a6fa 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tc_tunnel.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tc_tunnel.sh
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ readonly ns1_v4=192.168.1.1
>   readonly ns2_v4=192.168.1.2
>   readonly ns1_v6=fd::1
>   readonly ns2_v6=fd::2
> +readonly nsim_v4=192.168.2.1
>   
>   # Must match port used by bpf program
>   readonly udpport=5555
> @@ -67,6 +68,10 @@ cleanup() {
>   	if [[ -n $server_pid ]]; then
>   		kill $server_pid 2> /dev/null
>   	fi
> +
> +	if [ -e /sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim1 ]; then
> +	    echo 1 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device
> +	fi
>   }
>   
>   server_listen() {
> @@ -93,6 +98,25 @@ verify_data() {
>   	fi
>   }
>   
> +decap_sanity() {
> +    echo "test decap sanity"
> +    modprobe netdevsim
> +    echo 1 1 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
> +    udevadm settle
> +    nsim=$(ls /sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim1/net/)
> +    ip link set dev $nsim up
> +    ip addr add dev $nsim $nsim_v4/24
> +
> +    tc qdisc add dev $nsim clsact
> +    tc filter add dev $nsim egress \
> +       bpf direct-action object-file ${BPF_FILE} section decap
> +
> +    echo abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz | \
> +	nc -u 192.168.2.2 7777

Thanks for the fix and the idea on how to test it.

I have posted a patch to translate this test to a test for test_progs that can 
finish and exit such that it can be run continuously in CI.  The test attaches a 
tc-bpf at lo and the bpf prog directly checks for the skb->ip_summed == 
CHECKSUM_NONE and the broken csum_start condition.

If the test_progs patch looks good, patch 1 can be landed first and then land 
the test_progs patch.  wdyt?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20  0:47 [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: pull before calling skb_postpull_rcsum() Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-20  0:47 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: tunnel: add sanity test for checksums Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-20 23:13   ` [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skb_adjust_room on CHECKSUM_PARTIAL Martin KaFai Lau
2022-12-20 23:21   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2022-12-20 23:36     ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: tunnel: add sanity test for checksums Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-20  1:21 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: pull before calling skb_postpull_rcsum() Stanislav Fomichev
2022-12-20  1:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-20  1:55     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-12-21  0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7372590a-f40b-17d1-f780-3bd1ce4f30bb@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox