From: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kuba@kernel.org,
martin.lau@kernel.org, mohsin.bashr@gmail.com, saeedm@nvidia.com,
tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v1 0/7] Add kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:39:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7695218f-2193-47f8-82ac-fc843a3a56b0@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825193918.3445531-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
On 25/08/2025 22:39, Amery Hung wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data() to allow
> pulling nonlinear xdp data. This may be useful when a driver places
> headers in fragments. When an xdp program would like to keep parsing
> packet headers using direct packet access, it can call
> bpf_xdp_pull_data() to make the header available in the linear data
> area. The kfunc can also be used to decapsulate the header in the
> nonlinear data, as currently there is no easy way to do this.
I'm currently working on a series that converts the xdp_native program
to use dynptr for accessing header data. If accepted, it should provide
better performance, since dynptr can access without copying the data.
> This patchset also tries to fix an issue in the mlx5e driver. The driver
> curretly assumes the packet layout to be unchanged after xdp program
> runs and may generate packet with corrupted data or trigger kernel warning
> if xdp programs calls layout-changing kfunc such as bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(),
> bpf_xdp_adjust_head() or bpf_xdp_pull_data() introduced in this set.
Thanks for working on this!
> Tested with the added bpf selftest using bpf test_run and also on
> mlx5e with the tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/xdp.py. mlx5e with
> striding RQ will produce xdp_buff with empty linear data.
> xdp.test_xdp_native_pass_mb would fail to parse the header before this
> patchset.
I got a crash when testing this series with the xdp_dummy program from
tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/. Need to make sure we're not breaking
compatibility for programs that keep the linear part empty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-25 19:39 [RFC bpf-next v1 0/7] Add kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data Amery Hung
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 1/7] net/mlx5e: Fix generating skb from nonlinear xdp_buff Amery Hung
2025-08-27 13:45 ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-08-28 3:44 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-28 16:23 ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-08-28 13:41 ` Nimrod Oren
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 2/7] bpf: Allow bpf_xdp_shrink_data to shrink a frag from head and tail Amery Hung
2025-08-28 13:43 ` Nimrod Oren
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 3/7] bpf: Support pulling non-linear xdp data Amery Hung
2025-08-25 21:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-08-25 22:23 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-25 22:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-25 22:36 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-25 22:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-08-25 22:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-26 0:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-08-26 0:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-25 22:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-26 5:12 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-26 13:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-26 13:44 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 4/7] bpf: Clear packet pointers after changing packet data in kfuncs Amery Hung
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 5/7] bpf: Support specifying linear xdp packet data size in test_run Amery Hung
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 6/7] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_xdp_pull_data Amery Hung
2025-08-25 19:39 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 7/7] selftests: drv-net: Pull data before parsing headers Amery Hung
2025-08-25 22:41 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 0/7] Add kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-26 19:38 ` Gal Pressman
2025-08-28 13:39 ` Nimrod Oren [this message]
2025-08-29 7:26 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-30 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-29 18:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7695218f-2193-47f8-82ac-fc843a3a56b0@nvidia.com \
--to=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).