From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Calvin Owens <jcalvinowens@gmail.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
David S Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kprobes: Allow kprobes with CONFIG_MODULES=n
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 22:16:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79062fa3-3402-47b3-8920-9231ad05e964@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2af01251ca21d79fa29092505d192f1f1b746cff.1709676663.git.jcalvinowens@gmail.com>
Le 06/03/2024 à 21:05, Calvin Owens a écrit :
> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de jcalvinowens@gmail.com. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> If something like this is merged down the road, it can go in at leisure
> once the module_alloc change is in: it's a one-way dependency.
Too many #ifdef, please reorganise stuff to avoid that and avoid
changing prototypes based of CONFIG_MODULES.
Other few comments below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <jcalvinowens@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 2 +-
> kernel/kprobes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index cfc24ced16dd..e60ce984d095 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ config GENERIC_ENTRY
>
> config KPROBES
> bool "Kprobes"
> - depends on MODULES
> depends on HAVE_KPROBES
> + select MODULE_ALLOC
> select KALLSYMS
> select TASKS_RCU if PREEMPTION
> help
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 9d9095e81792..194270e17d57 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1556,8 +1556,12 @@ static bool is_cfi_preamble_symbol(unsigned long addr)
> str_has_prefix("__pfx_", symbuf);
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> struct module **probed_mod)
> +#else
> +static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p)
> +#endif
A bit ugly to have to change the prototype, why not just keep probed_mod
at all time ?
When CONFIG_MODULES is not selected, __module_text_address() returns
NULL so it should work without that many #ifdefs.
> {
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1580,6 +1584,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> goto out;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> /* Check if 'p' is probing a module. */
> *probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
> if (*probed_mod) {
> @@ -1603,6 +1608,8 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> ret = -ENOENT;
> }
> }
> +#endif
> +
> out:
> preempt_enable();
> jump_label_unlock();
> @@ -1614,7 +1621,9 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> int ret;
> struct kprobe *old_p;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> struct module *probed_mod;
> +#endif
> kprobe_opcode_t *addr;
> bool on_func_entry;
>
> @@ -1633,7 +1642,11 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> p->nmissed = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->list);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> ret = check_kprobe_address_safe(p, &probed_mod);
> +#else
> + ret = check_kprobe_address_safe(p);
> +#endif
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1676,8 +1689,10 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> if (probed_mod)
> module_put(probed_mod);
> +#endif
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2482,6 +2497,7 @@ int kprobe_add_area_blacklist(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> /* Remove all symbols in given area from kprobe blacklist */
> static void kprobe_remove_area_blacklist(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> @@ -2499,6 +2515,7 @@ static void kprobe_remove_ksym_blacklist(unsigned long entry)
> {
> kprobe_remove_area_blacklist(entry, entry + 1);
> }
> +#endif
>
> int __weak arch_kprobe_get_kallsym(unsigned int *symnum, unsigned long *value,
> char *type, char *sym)
> @@ -2564,6 +2581,7 @@ static int __init populate_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long *start,
> return ret ? : arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist();
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> static void add_module_kprobe_blacklist(struct module *mod)
> {
> unsigned long start, end;
> @@ -2665,6 +2683,7 @@ static struct notifier_block kprobe_module_nb = {
> .notifier_call = kprobes_module_callback,
> .priority = 0
> };
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) */
>
> void kprobe_free_init_mem(void)
> {
> @@ -2724,8 +2743,11 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
> err = arch_init_kprobes();
> if (!err)
> err = register_die_notifier(&kprobe_exceptions_nb);
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> if (!err)
> err = register_module_notifier(&kprobe_module_nb);
> +#endif
>
> kprobes_initialized = (err == 0);
> kprobe_sysctls_init();
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index c4c6e0e0068b..dd4598f775b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_has_gone(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> return kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp);
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_within_module(struct trace_kprobe *tk,
> struct module *mod)
> {
> @@ -129,6 +130,12 @@ static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_module_exist(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +#else
> +static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_module_exist(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> static bool trace_kprobe_is_busy(struct dyn_event *ev)
> {
> @@ -670,6 +677,7 @@ static int register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> /* Module notifier call back, checking event on the module */
> static int trace_kprobe_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long val, void *data)
> @@ -704,6 +712,7 @@ static struct notifier_block trace_kprobe_module_nb = {
> .notifier_call = trace_kprobe_module_callback,
> .priority = 1 /* Invoked after kprobe module callback */
> };
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) */
>
> static int count_symbols(void *data, unsigned long unused)
> {
> @@ -1897,8 +1906,10 @@ static __init int init_kprobe_trace_early(void)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> if (register_module_notifier(&trace_kprobe_module_nb))
> return -EINVAL;
Why a #if here ?
If CONFIG_MODULES is not selected, register_module_notifier() return
always 0.
> +#endif
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 20:05 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Make bpf_jit and kprobes work with CONFIG_MODULES=n Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] module: mm: Make module_alloc() generally available Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 14:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-08 20:53 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-08 2:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 20:43 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] bpf: Allow BPF_JIT with CONFIG_MODULES=n Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 22:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-08 21:04 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kprobes: Allow kprobes " Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-08 2:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 20:36 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 22:16 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-03-08 21:02 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-08 2:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 20:57 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Support testing the !MODULES case Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 21:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Make bpf_jit and kprobes work with CONFIG_MODULES=n Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-06 23:23 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 1:58 ` Song Liu
2024-03-08 2:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 2:55 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-08 20:27 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-08 2:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-25 22:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79062fa3-3402-47b3-8920-9231ad05e964@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jcalvinowens@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox