public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
Cc: sdf@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:24:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a375393-ca58-6dd2-67eb-0eb77b430384@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230503225351.3700208-9-aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>

On 5/3/23 3:53 PM, Aditi Ghag wrote:
> The test cases for destroying sockets mirror the intended usages of the
> bpf_sock_destroy kfunc using iterators.
> 
> The destroy helpers set `ECONNABORTED` error code that we can validate in
> the test code with client sockets. But UDP sockets have an overriding error
> code from the disconnect called during abort, so the error code the
> validation is only done for TCP sockets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c   | 215 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c   | 145 ++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d5f76731b4a3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
> +
> +#include "sock_destroy_prog.skel.h"
> +#include "network_helpers.h"
> +
> +#define TEST_NS "sock_destroy_netns"
> +
> +static void start_iter_sockets(struct bpf_program *prog)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_link *link;
> +	char buf[50] = {};
> +	int iter_fd, len;
> +
> +	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
> +		goto free_link;
> +
> +	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> +		;
> +	ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
> +
> +	close(iter_fd);
> +
> +free_link:
> +	bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_tcp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n;
> +
> +	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);

The original serv fd is over-written and lost.

> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "serv accept"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, 1, "client send"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys connected client sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_client);
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNABORTED, "error code on destroyed socket");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	if (clien != -1)
> +		close(clien);
> +	if (serv != -1)
> +		close(serv);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_tcp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n, serv_port;
> +
> +	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	serv_port = get_socket_local_port(serv);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv_port, 0, "get_sock_local_port"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	skel->bss->serv_port = (__be16) serv_port;
> +
> +	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);

Same here.

> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "serv accept"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, 1, "client send"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_server);
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNRESET, "error code on destroyed socket");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	if (clien != -1)
> +		close(clien);
> +	if (serv != -1)
> +		close(serv);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_udp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;
> +
> +	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, 1, "client send"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_udp6_client);
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	/* UDP sockets have an overriding error code after they are disconnected,
> +	 * so we don't check for ECONNABORTED error code.
> +	 */
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	if (clien != -1)
> +		close(clien);
> +	if (serv != -1)
> +		close(serv);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_udp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int *listen_fds = NULL, n, i, serv_port;
> +	unsigned int num_listens = 5;
> +	char buf[1];
> +
> +	/* Start reuseport servers. */
> +	listen_fds = start_reuseport_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM,
> +					    "::1", 0, 0, num_listens);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(listen_fds, "start_reuseport_server"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	serv_port = get_socket_local_port(listen_fds[0]);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv_port, 0, "get_sock_local_port"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	skel->bss->serv_port = (__be16) serv_port;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_udp6_server);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_listens; ++i) {
> +		n = read(listen_fds[i], buf, sizeof(buf));
> +		if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, -1, "read") ||
> +		    !ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNABORTED, "error code on destroyed socket"))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	ASSERT_EQ(i, num_listens, "server socket");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	free_fds(listen_fds, num_listens);
> +}
> +
> +void test_sock_destroy(void)
> +{
> +	struct sock_destroy_prog *skel;
> +	struct nstoken *nstoken;

This does need a '= NULL;' now after consolidating to one "cleanup" label. Even 
the v6 patch needs a ' = NULL;' considering the SYS() below may do a goto also, 
so I was incorrect on my v6 comment and stand to be corrected by the compiler: 
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4877289517/jobs/8701781601

> +	int cgroup_fd;
> +
> +	skel = sock_destroy_prog__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/sock_destroy");
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	skel->links.sock_connect = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(
> +		skel->progs.sock_connect, cgroup_fd);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.sock_connect, "prog_attach"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	SYS(cleanup, "ip netns add %s", TEST_NS);
> +	SYS(cleanup, "ip -net %s link set dev lo up", TEST_NS);
> +
> +	nstoken = open_netns(TEST_NS);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "open_netns"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_client"))
> +		test_tcp_client(skel);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_server"))
> +		test_tcp_server(skel);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("udp_client"))
> +		test_udp_client(skel);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("udp_server"))
> +		test_udp_server(skel);
> +
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	if (nstoken)
> +		close_netns(nstoken);
> +	SYS_NOFAIL("ip netns del " TEST_NS " &> /dev/null");
> +	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
> +		close(cgroup_fd);
> +	sock_destroy_prog__destroy(skel);
> +}


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-05  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-03 22:53 [PATCH v7 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Add socket destroy capability Aditi Ghag
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: tcp: Avoid taking fast sock lock in iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 02/10] udp: seq_file: Helper function to match socket attributes Aditi Ghag
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: udp: Encapsulate logic to get udp table Aditi Ghag
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 04/10] udp: seq_file: Remove bpf_seq_afinfo from udp_iter_state Aditi Ghag
2023-05-04  1:25   ` Aditi Ghag
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 05/10] bpf: udp: Implement batching for sockets iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc Aditi Ghag
2023-05-05  0:13   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-05 18:49     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-05 20:05       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: Add helper to get port using getsockname Aditi Ghag
2023-05-04 17:33   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy Aditi Ghag
2023-05-05  0:24   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 09/10] bpf: Add a kfunc filter function to 'struct btf_kfunc_id_set' Aditi Ghag
2023-05-05  0:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-03 22:53 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: Extend bpf_sock_destroy tests Aditi Ghag

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a375393-ca58-6dd2-67eb-0eb77b430384@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox