From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta1.migadu.com (out-170.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF90826AF6 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743445542; cv=none; b=inll7jJR2uZwzBPJqKU+tEd9yELRHyOJkR9t5o7Qhq5jNlyat3w+G5ZRk6qo9d+mKsACfC726yZyrdmuZ+TduSDPmcFtKXK9sSO9jmHGv4TvE9DCJtT0TfR6KKycQi1C1dOr2+CkZDgWZSb/MEWqxSSSkeA5D4SFhvd252LO64Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743445542; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pu96DIbooOmxV8pJCtAzjKBE1wadXve8KxneYS4ywuo=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Content-Type:From:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc; b=jtuwsX+qQRfltf0l//7htwaKLV+Gk6FPUaEKG8xrmcjt+SeYx9IJok/u6GyI5SiDn9mSLOU5d26V/KcaQtT2310lCPn+Gg5Ea4xOuqZfnKJkKLa0+9FjNVh/UTFUCPFpuB7y2DJ2A7mVSNSi+tPKPv04AIGEZb5mGN0QBblcDow= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=Tg/SNbRb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="Tg/SNbRb" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1743445537; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FvBj1iEW0gd5QfOo+0DeNiD0z9d0Jhykfjty6wB3Svo=; b=Tg/SNbRbcnK+XkArnyTt2/oKbrap2FmDE1LPGZFCbdu88fZLQse/EQv22my6pfx9J7/Yjy 4ZRg7hgaGMfDrl7tUQ0A2UqeD2yCnNFm+WBwgQ/pmuzSPCd9EohX2jBQiMJMD1OFRdDzYB OnrkUbG8CSbIJIyoXJDqI7XJOq83djI= Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:25:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Ihor Solodrai" Message-ID: <7adb418e282468fcd5dc10c05790614e622579d4@linux.dev> TLS-Required: No Subject: s390x: selftests/bpf are failing on CI To: "Ilya Leoshkevich" Cc: "Yonghong Song" , "Song Liu" , "Alexei Starovoitov" , bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hi Ilya, After recent merges from upstream, CI started failing both on bpf and bpf-next trees. Yonghong Song and Song Liu submitted a couple of fixes that are already applied to bpf tree, but there are still failures on s390x. https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/14163772245 Could you please investigate? A snippet from the log: #11 atomics:OK trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function __s390x_sys_bpf trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function __s390x_sys_nanosleep trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function __s390x_sys_nanosleep trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function __s390x_sys_nanosleep trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function __s390x_sys_nanosleep trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function __s390x_sys_nanosleep test_attach_probe:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_probe:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_attach_probe:PASS:check_bss 0 nsec test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load 0 nsec test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:uprobe_offset 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'handle_kprobe': failed to create kprobe '__s390x_sys_na= nosleep+0x0' perf event: -EINVAL test_attach_probe_manual:FAIL:attach_kprobe unexpected error: -22 #12/1 attach_probe/manual-default:FAIL test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load 0 nsec test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:uprobe_offset 0 nsec libbpf: failed to add legacy kprobe event for '__s390x_sys_nanosleep+= 0x0': -EINVAL libbpf: prog 'handle_kprobe': failed to create kprobe '__s390x_sys_na= nosleep+0x0' perf event: -EINVAL test_attach_probe_manual:FAIL:attach_kprobe unexpected error: -22 #12/2 attach_probe/manual-legacy:FAIL test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load 0 nsec test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:uprobe_offset 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'handle_kprobe': failed to create kprobe '__s390x_sys_na= nosleep+0x0' perf event: -EINVAL test_attach_probe_manual:FAIL:attach_kprobe unexpected error: -22 #12/3 attach_probe/manual-perf:FAIL test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load 0 nsec test_attach_probe_manual:PASS:uprobe_offset 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'handle_kprobe': failed to create kprobe '__s390x_sys_na= nosleep+0x0' perf event: -EINVAL test_attach_probe_manual:FAIL:attach_kprobe unexpected error: -22 #12/4 attach_probe/manual-link:FAIL libbpf: prog 'handle_kprobe_auto': failed to create kprobe '__se_sys_= nanosleep+0x0' perf event: -ENOENT test_attach_probe_auto:FAIL:attach_kprobe_auto unexpected error: -2 libbpf: prog 'handle_kretprobe_auto': failed to create kretprobe '__s= e_sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: -ENOENT test_attach_probe_auto:FAIL:attach_kretprobe_auto unexpected error: -= 2 test_attach_probe_auto:PASS:auto-attach should fail for old-style nam= e 0 nsec test_attach_probe_auto:PASS:attach_uretprobe_byname 0 nsec test_attach_probe_auto:FAIL:check_kprobe_auto_res unexpected check_kp= robe_auto_res: actual 0 !=3D expected 11 test_attach_probe_auto:FAIL:check_kretprobe_auto_res unexpected check= _kretprobe_auto_res: actual 0 !=3D expected 22 test_attach_probe_auto:PASS:check_uretprobe_byname_res 0 nsec #12/5 attach_probe/auto:FAIL