BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, davemarchevsky@fb.com, joannekoong@fb.com,
	geliang.tang@suse.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	songmuchun@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com,
	cong.wang@bytedance.com, zhouchengming@bytedance.com,
	yosryahmed@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 20:09:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80ab09cf-6072-a75a-082d-2721f6f907ef@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220516022453.68420-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>



On 5/15/22 7:24 PM, Feng zhou wrote:
> From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
> 
> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220511093854.411-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/T/
> 
> use /* */ instead of //
> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> use 8 bytes for value size
> fix memory leak
> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
> 
> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>

LGTM with a few nits below.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

> ---
>   .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 49 +++++++++------
>   .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 61 ++++++++++++-------
>   2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>   
>   #include <test_progs.h>
>   

The above empty line is unnecessary.

>   #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>   
> -#define TEST_VALUE  1
> -
>   void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>   {
>   	struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
> -	int key = 0, ret;
> -	int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> -	int *buf;
> +	__u64 key = 0, sum;
> +	int ret, i;
> +	int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
> +	__u64 *buf;
>   
> -	buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> +	buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
>   	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
>   		return;
> -	memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> -	buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>   
> -	skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
> -	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
> -		return;
> +	for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
> +		buf[i] = i;
> +	sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
> +
> +	skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
> +		goto exit;
> +
> +	skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
> +
> +	ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
>   	ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
> -	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
> +		goto cleanup;
>   
>   	ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
>   	ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
> @@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>   
>   	syscall(__NR_getuid);
>   
> -	ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
> -	      skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
> -	      skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
> -	ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
> +	test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array lookup percpu elem");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash lookup percpu elem");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
>   
> +cleanup:
>   	test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
> +exit:
> +	free(buf);
>   }
[...]
> +struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
> +	void *map;
> +	__u64 sum;
> +};
> +
> +static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	__u64 key = 0;
> +	__u64 *value;

Please add an empty line here.

> +	value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
> +	if (value)
> +		ctx->sum += *value;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16  2:24 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase Feng zhou
2022-05-17  3:09 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-05-17  7:05   ` [External] " Feng Zhou
2022-05-19  0:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19  3:26   ` [External] " Feng Zhou
2022-05-19  4:38     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19  7:31       ` Feng Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80ab09cf-6072-a75a-082d-2721f6f907ef@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=geliang.tang@suse.com \
    --cc=joannekoong@fb.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
    --cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox