From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,
shuah@kernel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, thinker.li@gmail.com,
zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com, davemarchevsky@fb.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:22:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81431b5d-0e0f-485a-a3ce-af8e63169552@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220035105.34626-2-dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
On 2/19/24 19:51, Menglong Dong wrote:
> In this commit, we add the 'accessed_args' field to struct bpf_prog_aux,
> which is used to record the accessed index of the function args in
> btf_ctx_access().
>
> Meanwhile, we add the function btf_check_func_part_match() to compare the
> accessed function args of two function prototype. This function will be
> used in the following commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 4 ++
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index c7aa99b44dbd..0225b8dbdd9d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
> /* function name for valid attach_btf_id */
> const char *attach_func_name;
> + u64 accessed_args;
> struct bpf_prog **func;
> void *jit_data; /* JIT specific data. arch dependent */
> struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke_tab;
> @@ -2566,6 +2567,9 @@ struct bpf_reg_state;
> int btf_prepare_func_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog);
> int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t);
> +int btf_check_func_part_match(struct btf *btf1, const struct btf_type *t1,
> + struct btf *btf2, const struct btf_type *t2,
> + u64 func_args);
> const char *btf_find_decl_tag_value(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *pt,
> int comp_idx, const char *tag_key);
> int btf_find_next_decl_tag(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *pt,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 6ff0bd1a91d5..3a6931402fe4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -6203,6 +6203,9 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
> /* skip first 'void *__data' argument in btf_trace_##name typedef */
> args++;
> nr_args--;
> + prog->aux->accessed_args |= (1 << (arg + 1));
> + } else {
> + prog->aux->accessed_args |= (1 << arg);
> }
>
> if (arg > nr_args) {
> @@ -7010,6 +7013,124 @@ int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *pr
> return btf_check_func_type_match(log, btf1, t1, btf2, t2);
> }
>
> +static u32 get_ctx_arg_total_size(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t)
> +{
> + const struct btf_param *args;
> + u32 size = 0, nr_args;
> + int i;
> +
> + nr_args = btf_type_vlen(t);
> + args = (const struct btf_param *)(t + 1);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
> + t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
> + size += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
> + }
> +
> + return size;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
> + int off)
> +{
> + const struct btf_param *args;
> + u32 offset = 0, nr_args;
> + int i;
> +
> + nr_args = btf_type_vlen(t);
> + args = (const struct btf_param *)(t + 1);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
> + if (offset == off)
> + return i;
> +
> + t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
> + offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
> + if (offset > off)
> + return -1;
> + }
> + return -1;
> +}
This one is very similar to get_ctx_arg_idx().
How about to refactor get_ctx_arg_idx() and share the code
between get_ctx_arg_idx() and get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned().
For example,
-static u32 get_ctx_arg_idx(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
*func_proto,
- int off)
+static u32 _get_ctx_arg_idx(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
*func_proto,
+ int off, u32 *arg_off)
{
const struct btf_param *args;
const struct btf_type *t;
u32 offset = 0, nr_args;
int i;
if (!func_proto)
return off / 8;
nr_args = btf_type_vlen(func_proto);
args = (const struct btf_param *)(func_proto + 1);
for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
+ if (arg_off)
+ *arg_off = offset;
t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
if (off < offset)
return i;
}
+ if (arg_off)
+ *arg_off = offset;
t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, func_proto->type, NULL);
offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
if (off < offset)
return nr_args;
return nr_args + 1;
}
+static u32 get_ctx_arg_idx(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
*func_proto,
+ int off)
+{
+ return _get_ctx_arg_idx(btf, func_proto, off, NULL);
+}
+
+static u32 get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned(struct btf *btf,
+ const struct btf_type *func_proto,
+ int off)
+{
+ u32 arg_off;
+ u32 arg_idx = _get_ctx_arg_idx(btf, func_proto, off, &arg_off);
+ return arg_off == off ? arg_idx : -1;
+}
+
> +
> +/* This function is similar to btf_check_func_type_match(), except that it
> + * only compare some function args of the function prototype t1 and t2.
> + */
> +int btf_check_func_part_match(struct btf *btf1, const struct btf_type *func1,
> + struct btf *btf2, const struct btf_type *func2,
> + u64 func_args)
> +{
> + const struct btf_param *args1, *args2;
> + u32 nargs1, i, offset = 0;
> + const char *s1, *s2;
> +
> + if (!btf_type_is_func_proto(func1) || !btf_type_is_func_proto(func2))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + args1 = (const struct btf_param *)(func1 + 1);
> + args2 = (const struct btf_param *)(func2 + 1);
> + nargs1 = btf_type_vlen(func1);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= nargs1; i++) {
> + const struct btf_type *t1, *t2;
> +
> + if (!(func_args & (1 << i)))
> + goto next;
> +
> + if (i < nargs1) {
> + int t2_index;
> +
> + /* get the index of the arg corresponding to args1[i]
> + * by the offset.
> + */
> + t2_index = get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned(btf2, func2,
> + offset);
> + if (t2_index < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, args1[i].type, NULL);
> + t2 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf2, args2[t2_index].type,
> + NULL);
> + } else {
> + /* i == nargs1, this is the index of return value of t1 */
> + if (get_ctx_arg_total_size(btf1, func1) !=
> + get_ctx_arg_total_size(btf2, func2))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* check the return type of t1 and t2 */
> + t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, func1->type, NULL);
> + t2 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf2, func2->type, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (t1->info != t2->info ||
> + (btf_type_has_size(t1) && t1->size != t2->size))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (btf_type_is_int(t1) || btf_is_any_enum(t1))
> + goto next;
> +
> + if (btf_type_is_struct(t1))
> + goto on_struct;
> +
> + if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, t1->type, NULL);
> + t2 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf2, t2->type, NULL);
> + if (!btf_type_is_struct(t1) || !btf_type_is_struct(t2))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> +on_struct:
> + s1 = btf_name_by_offset(btf1, t1->name_off);
> + s2 = btf_name_by_offset(btf2, t2->name_off);
> + if (strcmp(s1, s2))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +next:
> + if (i < nargs1) {
> + t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, args1[i].type, NULL);
> + offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t1) ? 8 : roundup(t1->size, 8);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static bool btf_is_dynptr_ptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t)
> {
> const char *name;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 3:51 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: make tracing program support multi-attach Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 17:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-21 2:58 ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-02-20 18:22 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-02-21 3:09 ` 梦龙董
2024-02-20 3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: tracing: support to attach program to multi hooks Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 17:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-21 5:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-20 3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] libbpf: allow to set coookie when target_btf_id is set in bpf_link_create Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] libbpf: add the function libbpf_find_kernel_btf_id() Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: add test cases for multiple attach of tracing program Menglong Dong
2024-02-21 1:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: make tracing program support multi-attach Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21 2:35 ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-02-21 2:45 ` 梦龙董
2024-02-21 3:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21 3:06 ` 梦龙董
2024-02-21 3:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21 3:57 ` 梦龙董
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81431b5d-0e0f-485a-a3ce-af8e63169552@gmail.com \
--to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox