BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: using rcu_read_lock for bpf_sk_storage_map iterator
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:56:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <837b7690-247a-083d-65f5-ea9dc48b972a@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915104001.0182ae73@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>



On 9/15/20 10:40 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:35:50 -0700 Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 9/15/20 8:33 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:46:30 -0700 Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>> Currently, we use bucket_lock when traversing bpf_sk_storage_map
>>>> elements. Since bpf_iter programs cannot use bpf_sk_storage_get()
>>>> and bpf_sk_storage_delete() helpers which may also grab bucket lock,
>>>> we do not have a deadlock issue which exists for hashmap when
>>>> using bucket_lock ([1]).
>>>>
>>>> If a bucket contains a lot of sockets, during bpf_iter traversing
>>>> a bucket, concurrent bpf_sk_storage_{get,delete}() may experience
>>>> some undesirable delays. Using rcu_read_lock() is a reasonable
>>>> compromise here. Although it may lose some precision, e.g.,
>>>> access stale sockets, but it will not hurt performance of other
>>>> bpf programs.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200902235341.2001534-1-yhs@fb.com
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>>>
>>> Sparse is not happy about it. Could you add some annotations, perhaps?
>>>
>>> include/linux/rcupdate.h:686:9: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_find_next' - unexpected unlock
>>> include/linux/rcupdate.h:686:9: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_stop' - unexpected unlock
>>
>> Okay, I will try.
>>
>> On my system, sparse is unhappy and core dumped....
>>
>> /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/include/linux/string.h:12:38: error: too
>> many errors
>> /bin/sh: line 1: 2710132 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) sparse
>> -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix
>> -D__unix__ -Wbitwise -Wno-return-void -Wno-unknown-attribute
>> -D__x86_64__ --arch=x86 -mlittle-endian -m64 -W
>> p,-MMD,net/core/.bpf_sk_storage.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
>> ...
>> /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
>> make[3]: *** [net/core/bpf_sk_storage.o] Error 139
>> make[3]: *** Deleting file `net/core/bpf_sk_storage.o'
>>
>> -bash-4.4$ rpm -qf /bin/sparse
>> sparse-0.5.2-1.el7.x86_64
>> -bash-4.4$
> 
> I think you need to build from source, sadly :(
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm//devel/sparse/sparse.git

Indeed, building sparse from source works. After adding some 
__releases(RCU) and __acquires(RCU), I now have:
   context imbalance in 'bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_find_next' - different 
lock contexts for basic block
I may need to restructure code to please sparse...

> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 18:46 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: using rcu_read_lock for bpf_sk_storage_map iterator Yonghong Song
2020-09-14 21:28 ` Song Liu
2020-09-15  5:25   ` Yonghong Song
2020-09-15 15:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-15 17:35   ` Yonghong Song
2020-09-15 17:40     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-15 18:56       ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2020-09-15 19:03         ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=837b7690-247a-083d-65f5-ea9dc48b972a@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox