From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] bpf: Craft non-linear skbs in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:50:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85545d76-1177-408e-8224-2fb98ffe8a2f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41b200d749ff0c1171b7f2ea60531126ba5e7a62.1758213407.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
On 9/18/25 9:47 AM, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> This patch adds support for crafting non-linear skbs in BPF test runs
I think it is useful. Thanks for working on it.
> for tc programs, via a new flag BPF_F_TEST_SKB_NON_LINEAR. When this
This commit message needs to be updated.
> flag is set, the size of the linear area is given by ctx->data_end, with
> a minimum of ETH_HLEN always pulled in the linear area.
>
> This is particularly useful to test support for non-linear skbs in large
> codebases such as Cilium. We've had multiple bugs in the past few years
> where we were missing calls to bpf_skb_pull_data(). This support in
> BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN would allow us to automatically cover this case in our
> BPF tests.
>
> In addition to the selftests introduced later in the series, this patch
> was tested by setting BPF_F_TEST_SKB_NON_LINEAR for all tc selftests
> programs and checking test failures were expected.
>
> Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 00b12d745479..222a54c24c70 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -660,21 +660,30 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release, KF_RELEASE)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
>
> static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
> - u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
> + u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom, bool nonlinear)
test_run_xdp() already has support for multi-frag/buf and doesn't need "bool
nonlinear". It also does not have the one-page limitation. Is there a reason
that test_run_skb() cannot follow what the test_run_xdp() does?
> {
> void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
> - void *data;
> + void *data, *dst;
>
> if (user_size < ETH_HLEN || user_size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
> - data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
> + /* In non-linear case, data_in is copied to the paged data */
> + if (nonlinear) {
> + data = alloc_page(GFP_USER);
> + } else {
> + size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
> + data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
> + }
> if (!data)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
> - kfree(data);
> + if (nonlinear)
> + dst = page_address(data);
> + else
> + dst = data + headroom;
> + if (copy_from_user(dst, data_in, user_size)) {
> + nonlinear ? __free_page(data) : kfree(data);
> return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 16:45 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] bpf: Support non-linear skbs for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Paul Chaignon
2025-09-18 16:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Refactor cleanup of bpf_prog_test_run_skb Paul Chaignon
2025-09-18 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Reorder bpf_prog_test_run_skb initialization Paul Chaignon
2025-09-18 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] bpf: Craft non-linear skbs in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Paul Chaignon
2025-09-18 18:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-10-01 21:39 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-09-18 16:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] selftests/bpf: Support non-linear flag in test loader Paul Chaignon
2025-09-18 16:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/5] selftests/bpf: Test direct packet access on non-linear skbs Paul Chaignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85545d76-1177-408e-8224-2fb98ffe8a2f@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox