BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: asm register constraint. Was: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Introduce "volatile compare" macro
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 19:33:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r4vra87.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mste4sjv.fsf@oracle.com> (Jose E. Marchesi's message of "Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:09:24 +0100")



> [I have just added a proposal for an agenda item to this week's BPF
>  Office Hours so we can discuss about BPF sub-registers and compiler
>  constraints, to complement this thread.]

Notes from the office hours:

Availability of 32-bit arithmetic instructions:

  (cpu >= v3 AND not disabled with -mno-alu32) OR -malu32

Compiler constraints:

  "r"

     64-bit register (rN) or 32-bit sub-register (wN), based on the mode of
     the operand.

     If 32-bit arithmetic available
        char, short -> wN and warning
        int -> wN
        long int -> rN
     Else
        char, short, int -> rN and warning
        long int -> rN

  "w"

     32-bit sub-register (wN) regardless of the mode of the operand.

     If 32-bit arithmetic available
       char, short -> wN and warning
       int -> wN
       long int -> wN and warning
     Else
       char, short, int, long int -> wN and warning

  "R"

     64-bit register (rN) regardless of the mode of the operand.

     char, short, int -> rN and warn
     long int -> rN

Additional constraints for instruction immediates:

  "I" imm32
  "i" imm64  (already exists as "i" is standard.)
  "O" off16

  warning if not in range.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-11 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-21  3:38 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: volatile compare Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-21  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/5] selftests/bpf: Attempt to build BPF programs with -Wsign-compare Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-21  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Introduce "volatile compare" macro Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-21  4:27   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-12-22 22:59     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-25 20:33       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 20:06         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-04 21:02           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-05 21:47         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-08 21:21           ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-08 23:16             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-08 21:33           ` asm register constraint. Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-08 23:22             ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-09 10:49             ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-01-09 12:09               ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-01-11 18:33                 ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-01-15 16:33                   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-16 17:47                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-16 19:07                       ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-16 19:34                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-16 23:14                           ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-17 22:43                             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-16 23:55                       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-16 18:40                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-16 23:15                       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-11  2:46               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-11 10:34                 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-01-11 16:46             ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-21  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: Convert exceptions_assert.c to bpf_cmp Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-21  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Remove bpf_assert_eq-like macros Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-21  3:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Attempt to convert profiler.c to bpf_cmp Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-21 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: volatile compare Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878r4vra87.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox