public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Aaron Esau <aaron1esau@gmail.com>
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] bpf: use-after-free in hashtab BPF_F_LOCK in-place update path
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:09:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a4vti79o.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP01T7712ZmLy2YaViHtZ=2RqtF4i_F49Vyb_UC8NgQcYX8j5g@mail.gmail.com>

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 at 03:54, Aaron Esau <aaron1esau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Yes, if all the users have BPF_F_LOCK then it will work because the
>> > re-used element will have the same lock and everything is serialized.
>> > But this reproducer is trying to show that the elements are being
>> > re-used, which they are.
>>
>> Updated reproducer attached. All operations now use BPF_F_LOCK (updates,
>> re-add after delete, and lookups), so value access is serialized via the
>> element's embedded spin_lock. The value size is ~4000 bytes. Torn writes
>> are still observed (3 in 2.7M).
>>
>> With full spin_lock coverage, the only remaining unlocked write path is
>> alloc_htab_elem() -> copy_map_value(), which copies into a newly
>> allocated element prior to insertion. For this to race with a locked
>> reader or writer, the reader must be dereferencing a stale pointer to
>> memory that has been freed and reallocated -- a use-after-free.
>>
>> The root cause is bpf_mem_cache_free() in htab_elem_free(), which
>> immediately returns memory to the per-CPU freelist rather than deferring
>> via RCU. This allows reuse while the syscall path is still within an RCU
>> read-side critical section. Preallocated maps do not have this problem
>> because freed elements remain within a pool of valid htab_elems.
>>
>> Switching to bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu(), as Puranjay showed earlier in this
>> thread, eliminates the corruption.
>
> As I said, the reuse is intended behavior. We won't be switching to
> bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu().
> This is mostly for performance reasons, in case you're perplexed as to why.
> That said, we could do copy_map_value_locked() if map_flags &
> BPF_F_LOCK to fix this particular case.
> Such that if the value is being reused we will still have serialization.
I think we should do copy_map_value_locked() on the reuse path.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-26  8:49 [BUG] bpf: use-after-free in hashtab BPF_F_LOCK in-place update path Aaron Esau
2026-03-26 13:39 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-26 14:58   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-26 15:02   ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-26 15:26   ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-26 15:33     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-26 15:43       ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-26 15:47         ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-26 15:57           ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-27  2:44             ` Aaron Esau
2026-03-27  3:21               ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-27 16:09                 ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a4vti79o.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaron1esau@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox