From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] libbpf: error reporting changes for v1.0
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 22:53:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6ojzwdi.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzY0=J1KP4txDSVJdS93YVLxO8LLQTn0UCJ0RKDL_XzpYw@mail.gmail.com>
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:36 PM John Fastabend
> <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> > Implement error reporting changes discussed in "Libbpf: the road to v1.0"
>> > ([0]) document.
>> >
>> > Libbpf gets a new API, libbpf_set_strict_mode() which accepts a set of flags
>> > that turn on a set of libbpf 1.0 changes, that might be potentially breaking.
>> > It's possible to opt-in into all current and future 1.0 features by specifying
>> > LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL flag.
>> >
>> > When some of the 1.0 "features" are requested, libbpf APIs might behave
>> > differently. In this patch set a first set of changes are implemented, all
>> > related to the way libbpf returns errors. See individual patches for details.
>> >
>> > Patch #1 adds a no-op libbpf_set_strict_mode() functionality to enable
>> > updating selftests.
>> >
>> > Patch #2 gets rid of all the bad code patterns that will break in libbpf 1.0
>> > (exact -1 comparison for low-level APIs, direct IS_ERR() macro usage to check
>> > pointer-returning APIs for error, etc). These changes make selftest work in
>> > both legacy and 1.0 libbpf modes. Selftests also opt-in into 100% libbpf 1.0
>> > mode to automatically gain all the subsequent changes, which will come in
>> > follow up patches.
>> >
>> > Patch #3 streamlines error reporting for low-level APIs wrapping bpf() syscall.
>> >
>> > Patch #4 streamlines errors for all the rest APIs.
>> >
>> > Patch #5 ensures that BPF skeletons propagate errors properly as well, as
>> > currently on error some APIs will return NULL with no way of checking exact
>> > error code.
>> >
>> > [0] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UyjTZuPFWiPFyKk1tV5an11_iaRuec6U-ZESZ54nNTY
>> >
>> > Andrii Nakryiko (5):
>> > libbpf: add libbpf_set_strict_mode() API to turn on libbpf 1.0
>> > behaviors
>> > selftests/bpf: turn on libbpf 1.0 mode and fix all IS_ERR checks
>> > libbpf: streamline error reporting for low-level APIs
>> > libbpf: streamline error reporting for high-level APIs
>> > bpftool: set errno on skeleton failures and propagate errors
>> >
>>
>> LGTM for the series,
>>
>> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks, John!
>
> Toke, Stanislav, you cared about these aspects of libbpf 1.0 (by
> commenting on the doc itself), do you mind also taking a brief look
> and letting me know if this works for your use cases? Thanks!
Changes LGTM:
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
As a side note, the series seems to have been chopped up into individual
emails with no threading; was a bit weird that I had to go hunting for
the individual patches in my mailbox...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 23:42 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] libbpf: error reporting changes for v1.0 Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-24 6:36 ` John Fastabend
2021-05-24 19:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-24 20:35 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2021-05-24 21:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-24 20:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-05-24 21:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-24 21:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-05-24 21:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-24 22:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-05-25 0:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6ojzwdi.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox