From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v2 5/6] bpf, sockmap: Handle memory acct if skb_verdict prog redirects to self
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:31:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blfxweyj.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160522367856.135009.17304729578208922913.stgit@john-XPS-13-9370>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:27 AM CET, John Fastabend wrote:
> If the skb_verdict_prog redirects an skb knowingly to itself, fix your
> BPF program this is not optimal and an abuse of the API please use
> SK_PASS. That said there may be cases, such as socket load balancing,
> where picking the socket is hashed based or otherwise picks the same
> socket it was received on in some rare cases. If this happens we don't
> want to confuse userspace giving them an EAGAIN error if we can avoid
> it.
>
> To avoid double accounting in these cases. At the moment even if the
> skb has already been charged against the sockets rcvbuf and forward
> alloc we check it again and do set_owner_r() causing it to be orphaned
> and recharged. For one this is useless work, but more importantly we
> can have a case where the skb could be put on the ingress queue, but
> because we are under memory pressure we return EAGAIN. The trouble
> here is the skb has already been accounted for so any rcvbuf checks
> include the memory associated with the packet already. This rolls
> up and can result in unecessary EAGAIN errors in userspace read()
> calls.
>
> Fix by doing an unlikely check and skipping checks if skb->sk == sk.
>
> Fixes: 51199405f9672 ("bpf: skb_verdict, support SK_PASS on RX BPF path")
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/core/skmsg.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> index 9aed5a2c7c5b..f747ee341fe8 100644
> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> @@ -404,11 +404,13 @@ static struct sk_msg *sk_psock_create_ingress_msg(struct sock *sk,
> {
> struct sk_msg *msg;
>
> - if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
> - return NULL;
> + if (likely(skb->sk != sk)) {
> + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
> + return NULL;
>
> - if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb, skb->truesize))
> - return NULL;
> + if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb, skb->truesize))
> + return NULL;
> + }
>
> msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg), __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (unlikely(!msg))
> @@ -455,9 +457,12 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
> * the BPF program was run initiating the redirect to the socket
> * we will eventually receive this data on. The data will be released
> * from skb_consume found in __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() after its been copied
> - * into user buffers.
> + * into user buffers. If we are receiving on the same sock skb->sk is
> + * already assigned, skip memory accounting and owner transition seeing
> + * it already set correctly.
> */
> - skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
> + if (likely(skb->sk != sk))
> + skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
> return sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(skb, psock, sk, msg);
> }
>
I think all the added checks boil down to having:
struct sock *sk = psock->sk;
if (unlikely(skb->sk == sk))
return sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(psock, skb);
... on entry to sk_psock_skb_ingress().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-16 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 23:26 [bpf PATCH v2 0/6] sockmap fixes John Fastabend
2020-11-12 23:26 ` [bpf PATCH v2 1/6] bpf, sockmap: fix partial copy_page_to_iter so progress can still be made John Fastabend
2020-11-12 23:27 ` [bpf PATCH v2 2/6] bpf, sockmap: Ensure SO_RCVBUF memory is observed on ingress redirect John Fastabend
2020-11-12 23:27 ` [bpf PATCH v2 3/6] bpf, sockmap: Use truesize with sk_rmem_schedule() John Fastabend
2020-11-12 23:27 ` [bpf PATCH v2 4/6] bpf, sockmap: Avoid returning unneeded EAGAIN when redirecting to self John Fastabend
2020-11-12 23:27 ` [bpf PATCH v2 5/6] bpf, sockmap: Handle memory acct if skb_verdict prog redirects " John Fastabend
2020-11-16 14:31 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2020-11-16 22:28 ` John Fastabend
2020-11-12 23:28 ` [bpf PATCH v2 6/6] bpf, sockmap: Avoid failures from skb_to_sgvec when skb has frag_list John Fastabend
2020-11-16 14:49 ` [bpf PATCH v2 0/6] sockmap fixes Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87blfxweyj.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox