From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020F61272CB for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 15:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709653600; cv=none; b=G5XLsL1dNxMfHqCULNSPkAY8018iUboJtoQ7ScgIgBHpHiqDChPzhT89diaP/k72LSWH8keIsVjDBKyeHU9XfpwqxaaJ4kuH744w6EW1I/6xHLgj2B9bUaZff5vaCCEZwa9ckCINKPoOr/zXsz4mQ0xIIjkGj7yDJwozLLIXLGk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709653600; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2iI6JWzEmbnlcxf2QAK8yU0eKhCAyzGePX+Bbweqq6g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kHhX8Z+PousNQtQnxgaL95u2JQjnbZGV2ELMMQRo0Um1xYHaZDcaJpAC4OvinMZ9IRtaP+WzEYPffTwaPnif2DMXpLrynxawW2F9pbwPX1p4+drB+Ag+7ShxbgKijWwU97ZuRjji9F05FFl5UMNyDDYelKT5bmWZJTiPAO3ogUs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=izBSssKJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="izBSssKJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709653597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2iI6JWzEmbnlcxf2QAK8yU0eKhCAyzGePX+Bbweqq6g=; b=izBSssKJ+8FGWf3MMiIjZ9LsjpGZt2EPS2X6W/6kK49EaotQvXL5sjkZ+F7VutbmOgZlNG EX3pMLg6kDWbPG/qT8xvZaiP5B2BQRvOjSaKb1qGa0ON8AcOX6gcCml8v5JXPcCLx3vKjc U50RtZwYHqlE7q6AHd/0aV5OmgWGaKk= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-639-uaPPoKbkOqCZxD4tczxVVQ-1; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:46:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: uaPPoKbkOqCZxD4tczxVVQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a43f3f8d7d8so406033166b.3 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 07:46:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709653594; x=1710258394; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2iI6JWzEmbnlcxf2QAK8yU0eKhCAyzGePX+Bbweqq6g=; b=tuogINh39wKmSZNrTzICtsOH4yBgzVPOPy9UxWi1+0JBG9tkcF7BWgt2Ss5be4CpZI bi5RgTJgYxW2zTZck0mzIRcnhDe/8E+4d5iY4luUMtR0S6h7XBZTQlio6MIKG/zoCol6 sXwAVa1hFmtdTXi0r+QhXBxMD9R/4XnxnOMiDcBot5UdZa3dBjdc16G6gUnhGaMw+eRq xFJNykZ5nj+tIM/evy7iBkRxN/ViZ4hEukZtdyieqt9S6ZtOmyVb2QmXxDllPUTRFXOr lPg0Qm4RMyfTIHgy9lq9eMy1UHLecUoCcuAvlD24Ayugy05nJqwctbZQiLRUB9ebh3aE UZKA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVniSkyS+eiDA19X44L5By3/euLRSd/yZpyI92b6aqPFLXDdUGzPM1zFZbT+iXGG7vO+SGP7Demyyiobl/glXdaY31z X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywely/9rVjoXMSr/+euxW/Wqjt3MkOfzBRffkrm9zi04GplWICk 2sbjwiBPS5vc0ruqs1cI35w554AYxfpg/yjR9+Awu1GuNjgK3oHWPqsX1s1iVUEtvYkDbdur76y 26s/Ly3g/NxtFtjLs3nrelnXJOIeh7dwJT0ioBJcYO8KNoiRVK+u41nxOhw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f253:b0:a45:7d2d:e313 with SMTP id gy19-20020a170906f25300b00a457d2de313mr3211026ejb.50.1709653594702; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 07:46:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6vNyIVmBfDN+vMb+noq7A9NEup/xBi1IoZLy7FLeW7jO0urxEGbGP1wKq4/XIzMQN8+aCtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f253:b0:a45:7d2d:e313 with SMTP id gy19-20020a170906f25300b00a457d2de313mr3211016ejb.50.1709653594370; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 07:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk ([45.145.92.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id an3-20020a17090656c300b00a451ef20743sm2977119ejc.197.2024.03.05.07.46.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Mar 2024 07:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C8A1112EF08; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:46:33 +0100 (CET) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Daniel Borkmann , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Magnus Karlsson , Prashant Batra , Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] xdp, bonding: Fix feature flags when there are no slave devs anymore In-Reply-To: <20240305090829.17131-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> References: <20240305090829.17131-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 16:46:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87cys8d6li.fsf@toke.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniel Borkmann writes: > Commit 9b0ed890ac2a ("bonding: do not report NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY") > changed the driver from reporting everything as supported before a device > was bonded into having the driver report that no XDP feature is supported > until a real device is bonded as it seems to be more truthful given > eventually real underlying devices decide what XDP features are supported. > > The change however did not take into account when all slave devices get > removed from the bond device. In this case after 9b0ed890ac2a, the driver > keeps reporting a feature mask of 0x77, that is, NETDEV_XDP_ACT_MASK & > ~NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY whereas it should have reported a feature > mask of 0. > > Fix it by resetting XDP feature flags in the same way as if no XDP program > is attached to the bond device. This was uncovered by the XDP bond selfte= st > which let BPF CI fail. After adjusting the starting masks on the latter > to 0 instead of NETDEV_XDP_ACT_MASK the test passes again together with > this fix. > > Fixes: 9b0ed890ac2a ("bonding: do not report NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY") > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann > Cc: Magnus Karlsson > Cc: Prashant Batra > Cc: Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen > Cc: Jakub Kicinski Ah yes, makes sense, of course we should reset the mask when devices are removed! Reviewed-by: Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen