From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
david.faust@oracle.com, cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: abstract loop unrolling pragmas in BPF selftests
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il2zdl43.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eea74ef852fc57e9fb69d18e1e5960523c4f7abb.camel@gmail.com> (Eduard Zingerman's message of "Thu, 08 Feb 2024 17:28:04 +0200")
> On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 16:05 +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 13:55 +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > However, it would be good if some clang wizard could confirm what
>> > > impact, if any, #pragma unroll (aka #pragma clang loop unroll(enabled))
>> > > has over -O2, before ditching these pragmas from the selftests.
>> >
>> > I compiled sefltests both with and without this patch,
>> > there are no differences in disassembly of generated BPF object files.
>> > (using current clang main).
>> >
>> > [...]
>>
>> Hmm, wouldn't that mean that the loops in profiler.inc.h never get
>> unrolled regardless of optimization level or pragma? (profiler2.c)
>>
>
> No, the generated code is different between profiler{1,2,3}, e.g.:
>
> $ llvm-objdump -d before/profiler1.bpf.o | wc -l
> 5356
> $ llvm-objdump -d before/profiler2.bpf.o | wc -l
> 2329
> $ llvm-objdump -d before/profiler3.bpf.o | wc -l
> 1915
>
> What I meant, is that generated code for before/profiler1.bpf.o
> and after/profiler1.bpf.o is identical, etc.
Right. But profiler2.c before and after the patch do:
--- Before:
profiler2.c:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
#define barrier_var(var) /**/
/* undef #define UNROLL */
#define INLINE /**/
#include "profiler.inc.h"
profiler.inc.h:
#ifdef UNROLL
#pragma unroll
#endif
for (WHATEVER) {
[...]
}
--- After:
profiler2.c:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
#define barrier_var(var) /**/
#define NO_UNROLL
#define INLINE /**/
#include "profiler.inc.h"
profiler.inc.h:
#ifdef NO_UNROLL
#pragma clang loop unroll(disable)
#endif
for (WHATEVER) {
[...]
}
---
If the compiler generates assembly code the same code for profile2.c for
before and after, that means that the loop does _not_ get unrolled when
profiler.inc.h is built with -O2 but without #pragma unroll.
But what if #pragma unroll is used? If it unrolls then, that would mean
that the pragma does something more than -funroll-loops/-O2.
Sorry if I am not making sense. Stuff like this confuses me to no end
;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 10:12 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: abstract loop unrolling pragmas in BPF selftests Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-07 21:45 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 11:32 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 12:55 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 14:18 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 15:05 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 15:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 15:35 ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-02-08 15:53 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 16:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 18:04 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 18:35 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 18:59 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 19:03 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 19:34 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 19:44 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 19:49 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 20:06 ` Jose E. Marchesi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87il2zdl43.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox