BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org,  martin.lau@linux.dev,  ast@kernel.org,
	edumazet@google.com,  davem@davemloft.net,  dsahern@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	 john.fastabend@gmail.com,  andrii@kernel.org, mhal@rbox.co,
	 yonghong.song@linux.dev,  daniel@iogearbox.net,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,  horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:35:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzbxvw9y.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218053408.437295-2-mrpre@163.com> (Jiayuan Chen's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:34:07 +0800")

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 01:34 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> 'sk->copied_seq' was updated in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
> action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
> the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to
> tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.
>
> It works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also modified
> 'sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb'
> to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.
>
> However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
> active(strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
> tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock)
> tcp_read_sock() now still update 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicated
> updates.
>
> In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
> in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
>
> The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
> correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.
>
> Modifying tcp_read_sock() or strparser implementation directly is
> unreasonable, as it is widely used in other modules.
>
> Here, we introduce a method tcp_bpf_read_sock() to replace
> 'sk->sk_socket->ops->read_sock' (like 'tls_build_proto()' does in
> tls_main.c). Such replacement action was also used in updating
> tcp_bpf_prots in tcp_bpf.c, so it's not weird.
> (Note that checkpatch.pl may complain missing 'const' qualifier when we
> define the bpf-specified 'proto_ops', but we have to do because we need
> update it).
>
> Also we remove strparser check in tcp_eat_skb() since we implement custom
> function tcp_bpf_read_sock() without copied_seq updating.
>
> Since strparser currently supports only TCP, it's sufficient for 'ops' to
> inherit inet_stream_ops.
>
> Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/skmsg.h |   2 +
>  include/net/tcp.h     |   1 +
>  net/core/skmsg.c      |   3 ++
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c        |   2 +-
>  net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c    | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> index 99cef92e6290..4a089afc09b7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> @@ -19,9 +19,6 @@ void tcp_eat_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	if (!skb || !skb->len || !sk_is_tcp(sk))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (skb_bpf_strparser(skb))
> -		return;
> -
>  	tcp = tcp_sk(sk);
>  	copied = tcp->copied_seq + skb->len;
>  	WRITE_ONCE(tcp->copied_seq, copied);
> @@ -578,6 +575,81 @@ static int tcp_bpf_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
>  	return copied > 0 ? copied : err;
>  }
>  
> +static void sock_replace_proto_ops(struct sock *sk,
> +				   const struct proto_ops *proto_ops)
> +{
> +	if (sk->sk_socket)
> +		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_socket->ops, proto_ops);
> +}
> +
> +/* The tcp_bpf_read_sock() is an alternative implementation
> + * of tcp_read_sock(), except that it does not update copied_seq.
> + */
> +static int tcp_bpf_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> +			     sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> +	struct sk_psock *psock;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	int offset;
> +	int copied = 0;
> +
> +	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
> +		return -ENOTCONN;
> +
> +	/* we are called from sk_psock_strp_data_ready() and
> +	 * psock has already been checked and can't be NULL.
> +	 */
> +	psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
> +	/* The offset keeps track of how much data was processed during
> +	 * the last call.
> +	 */
> +	offset = psock->strp_offset;
> +	while ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) {
> +		u8 tcp_flags;
> +		int used;
> +		size_t len;
> +
> +		len = skb->len - offset;
> +		tcp_flags = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags;
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk));
> +		used = recv_actor(desc, skb, offset, len);
> +		if (used <= 0) {
> +			/* None of the data in skb has been consumed.
> +			 * May -ENOMEM or other error happened
> +			 */
> +			if (!copied)
> +				copied = used;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(used > len))
> +			used = len;
> +		copied += used;
> +		if (used < len) {
> +			/* Strparser clone and consume all input skb except
> +			 * -ENOMEM happened and it will replay skb by it's
> +			 * framework later. So We need to keep offset and
> +			 * skb for next retry.
> +			 */
> +			offset += used;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Entire skb was consumed, and we don't need this skb
> +		 * anymore and clean the offset.
> +		 */
> +		offset = 0;
> +		tcp_eat_recv_skb(sk, skb);
> +		if (!desc->count)
> +			break;
> +		if (tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(psock->strp_offset, offset);
> +	return copied;
> +}
> +
>  enum {
>  	TCP_BPF_IPV4,
>  	TCP_BPF_IPV6,

[...]

To reiterate my earlier question / suggestion [1] - it would be great if
we can avoid duplicating what tcp_read_skb / tcp_read_sock already do.

Keeping extra state in sk_psock / strparser seems to be the key. I think
you should be able to switch strp_data_ready / str_read_sock to
->read_skb and make an adapter around strp_recv.

Rough code below is what I have in mind. Not tested, compiled
only. Don't expect it to work. And I haven't even looked how to address
the kTLS path. But you get the idea.

[1] https://msgid.link/87o71bx1l4.fsf@cloudflare.com

---8<---

diff --git a/include/net/strparser.h b/include/net/strparser.h
index 41e2ce9e9e10..0dd48c1bc23b 100644
--- a/include/net/strparser.h
+++ b/include/net/strparser.h
@@ -95,9 +95,14 @@ struct strparser {
 	u32 interrupted : 1;
 	u32 unrecov_intr : 1;
 
+	unsigned int need_bytes;
+
 	struct sk_buff **skb_nextp;
 	struct sk_buff *skb_head;
-	unsigned int need_bytes;
+
+	int rcv_err;
+	unsigned int rcv_off;
+
 	struct delayed_work msg_timer_work;
 	struct work_struct work;
 	struct strp_stats stats;
diff --git a/net/strparser/strparser.c b/net/strparser/strparser.c
index 8299ceb3e373..8a08996429d3 100644
--- a/net/strparser/strparser.c
+++ b/net/strparser/strparser.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/poll.h>
 #include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <linux/skmsg.h>
 #include <linux/socket.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
@@ -327,13 +328,39 @@ int strp_process(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(strp_process);
 
-static int strp_recv(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
-		     unsigned int orig_offset, size_t orig_len)
+static int strp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct strparser *strp = (struct strparser *)desc->arg.data;
-
-	return __strp_recv(desc, orig_skb, orig_offset, orig_len,
-			   strp->sk->sk_rcvbuf, strp->sk->sk_rcvtimeo);
+	struct sk_psock *psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
+	struct strparser *strp = &psock->strp;
+	read_descriptor_t desc = {
+		.arg.data = strp,
+		.count = 1,
+		.error = 0,
+	};
+	unsigned int off;
+	size_t len;
+	int used;
+
+	off = strp->rcv_off;
+	len = skb->len - off;
+	used = __strp_recv(&desc, skb, off, len,
+			   sk->sk_rcvbuf, sk->sk_rcvtimeo);
+	/* skb not consumed */
+	if (used <= 0) {
+		strp->rcv_err = used;
+		return used;
+	}
+	/* skb partially consumed */
+	if (used < len) {
+		strp->rcv_err = 0;
+		strp->rcv_off += used;
+		return -EPIPE;	/* stop reading */
+	}
+	/* skb fully consumed */
+	strp->rcv_err = 0;
+	strp->rcv_off = 0;
+	tcp_eat_recv_skb(sk, skb);
+	return used;
 }
 
 static int default_read_sock_done(struct strparser *strp, int err)
@@ -345,21 +372,14 @@ static int default_read_sock_done(struct strparser *strp, int err)
 static int strp_read_sock(struct strparser *strp)
 {
 	struct socket *sock = strp->sk->sk_socket;
-	read_descriptor_t desc;
 
-	if (unlikely(!sock || !sock->ops || !sock->ops->read_sock))
+	if (unlikely(!sock || !sock->ops || !sock->ops->read_skb))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	desc.arg.data = strp;
-	desc.error = 0;
-	desc.count = 1; /* give more than one skb per call */
-
 	/* sk should be locked here, so okay to do read_sock */
-	sock->ops->read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, strp_recv);
-
-	desc.error = strp->cb.read_sock_done(strp, desc.error);
+	sock->ops->read_skb(strp->sk, strp_read_skb);
 
-	return desc.error;
+	return strp->cb.read_sock_done(strp, strp->rcv_err);
 }
 
 /* Lower sock lock held */

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-18  5:34 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests Jiayuan Chen
2024-12-18  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation Jiayuan Chen
2024-12-18 15:35   ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2024-12-19  9:30     ` Jiayuan Chen
2024-12-20  7:06       ` John Fastabend
2024-12-23 20:57       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-12-23 22:57         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-12-24  7:16           ` Jiayuan Chen
2024-12-27 14:09             ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-12-18  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add strparser test for bpf Jiayuan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzbxvw9y.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=mrpre@163.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox