From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] mm: bpf kfuncs to access memcg data
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 19:36:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ms3desex.fsf@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQK26E47RF6TWKAXZizn1QQL1GBMx5MF9pqAA4+5ev1xWw@mail.gmail.com> (Alexei Starovoitov's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2025 19:25:10 -0800")
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 9:40 AM Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> writes:
>>
>> I believe it can go through the bpf tree or the mm tree.
>>
>> I'd slightly prefer the mm tree, simple because follow up bpf oom
>> patches have more changes on the mm side.
>>
>> If Alexei, Daniel and Andrii is fine with it, Andrew, can you, please,
>> pick them up?
>
> mm tree has no CI and no ability to test bpf things,
> so in mm tree it will dead weight while in bpf tree
> it will be continuously tested.
> So I don't really like the idea of anything bpf related
> to being in some random trees.
Ok, no problems. I've sent v1 with bpf-next prefix so it already got
covered. I'll do the same with v2 and will rely on bpf maintainers
to pick it up.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-20 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 1:57 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] mm: bpf kfuncs to access memcg data Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] mm: declare memcg_page_state_output() in memcontrol.h Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 21:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-19 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/6] mm: introduce BPF kfuncs to deal with memcg pointers Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 21:51 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-19 22:42 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/6] mm: introduce bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup() BPF kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 22:10 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-19 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] mm: introduce BPF kfuncs to access memcg statistics and events Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 2:15 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-19 2:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 22:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-19 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] mm: introduce BPF kfunc to access memory events Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 2:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-19 2:51 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 22:46 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-19 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] bpf: selftests: selftests for memcg stat kfuncs Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 23:07 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-20 3:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-12-19 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] mm: bpf kfuncs to access memcg data Roman Gushchin
2025-12-20 3:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-20 3:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-20 3:36 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ms3desex.fsf@linux.dev \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox