From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@kernel.org>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
houtao1@huawei.com, xukuohai@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] bpf: Free element after unlock in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem()
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:35:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o705oby2.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117101816.2101857-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> writes:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
>
> The freeing of special fields in map value may acquire a spin-lock
> (e.g., the freeing of bpf_timer), however, the lookup_and_delete_elem
> procedure has already held a raw-spin-lock, which violates the lockdep
> rule.
This implies that we're fixing a locking violation here? Does this need
a Fixes tag?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 10:18 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] Free htab element out of bucket lock Hou Tao
2025-01-17 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Free special fields after unlock in htab_lru_map_delete_node() Hou Tao
2025-01-17 12:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-17 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Bail out early in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() Hou Tao
2025-01-17 12:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-17 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] bpf: Free element after unlock " Hou Tao
2025-01-17 12:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-01-20 8:49 ` Hou Tao
2025-01-20 8:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-21 1:15 ` Hou Tao
2025-01-21 11:04 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-17 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT Hou Tao
2025-01-17 12:40 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-17 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add test case for the freeing of bpf_timer Hou Tao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o705oby2.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huawei.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox