From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
fweimer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andrii@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, beaub@linux.microsoft.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, indu.bhagat@oracle.com, jemarch@gnu.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jremus@linux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 05:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plehkjnb.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGVo9b1xiT1Moq-P@google.com>
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:15:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 12:44:51 +0100
>> Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> > In one of the commit messages in the perf series, Steven also gave
>> > `perf record -g -vv true` which was convenient for making sure it's
>> > correctly discovered deferred unwinding support.
>>
>> Although I posted the patch, the command "perf record -g -vv true" was
>> Namhyung's idea. Just wanted to give credit where credit was due.
>
> Yep, it's to check if perf tool ask the deferred callchain to the
> kernel. To check if the kernel returns the callchain properly is:
>
> $ perf report -D | grep -A5 CALLCHAIN_DEFERRED
Thanks both. I'll update my notes and tinker more.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 22:56 [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] unwind_user: Add user space unwinding API Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] unwind_user: Add frame pointer support Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] unwind_user: Add compat mode " Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] unwind_user/deferred: Add unwind_user_faultable() Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] unwind_user/deferred: Add unwind cache Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] unwind_user/deferred: Add deferred unwinding interface Steven Rostedt
2025-06-26 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-26 20:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] unwind deferred: Use bitmask to determine which callbacks to call Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] unwind deferred: Use SRCU unwind_deferred_task_work() Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] unwind: Clear unwind_mask on exit back to user space Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] unwind: Finish up unwind when a task exits Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] unwind_user/x86: Enable frame pointer unwinding on x86 Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] perf/x86: Rename and move get_segment_base() and make it global Steven Rostedt
2025-06-26 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-06-26 12:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-26 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-26 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] unwind_user/x86: Enable compat mode frame pointer unwinding on x86 Steven Rostedt
2025-06-26 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-06-26 12:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-27 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-27 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-30 12:50 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure Florian Weimer
2025-06-30 16:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-06-30 17:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-02 11:44 ` Sam James
2025-07-02 16:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-02 17:14 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-03 4:01 ` Sam James [this message]
2025-07-02 17:10 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plehkjnb.fsf@gentoo.org \
--to=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox