bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Cc: edumazet@google.com,  ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org,  martin.lau@linux.dev,  eddyz87@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org,  yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	 john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,  sdf@google.com,
	 haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,  davem@davemloft.net,
	 dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	 laoar.shao@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	 yangzhenze@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: tcp: Improve bpf write tcp opt performance
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 11:48:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87seyjwgme.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515081901.91058-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com> (Feng zhou's message of "Wed, 15 May 2024 16:19:01 +0800")

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 04:19 PM +08, Feng zhou wrote:
> From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
>
> Set the full package write tcp option, the test found that the loss
> will be 20%. If a package wants to write tcp option, it will trigger
> bpf prog three times, and call "tcp_send_mss" calculate mss_cache,
> call "tcp_established_options" to reserve tcp opt len, call
> "bpf_skops_write_hdr_opt" to write tcp opt, but "tcp_send_mss" before
> TSO. Through bpftrace tracking, it was found that during the pressure
> test, "tcp_send_mss" call frequency was 90w/s. Considering that opt
> len does not change often, consider caching opt len for optimization.

You could also make your BPF sock_ops program cache the value and return
the cached value when called for BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB.

If that is in your opinion prohibitevely expensive then it would be good
to see a sample program and CPU cycle measurements (bpftool prog profile).

>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/tcp.h            |  3 +++
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  8 +++++++-
>  net/ipv4/tcp_output.c          | 12 +++++++++++-
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  8 +++++++-
>  4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> index 6a5e08b937b3..74437fcf94a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
> @@ -455,6 +455,9 @@ struct tcp_sock {
>  					  * to recur itself by calling
>  					  * bpf_setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION, "itself").
>  					  */
> +	u8	bpf_opt_len;		/* save tcp opt len implementation
> +					 * BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB fast path
> +					 */
>  #define BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(TP, ARG) (TP->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags & ARG)
>  #else
>  #define BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(TP, ARG) 0
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 90706a47f6ff..f2092de1f432 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -6892,8 +6892,14 @@ enum {
>  	 * options first before the BPF program does.
>  	 */
>  	BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB_FLAG = (1<<6),
> +	/* Fast path to reserve space in a skb under
> +	 * sock_ops->op == BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB.
> +	 * opt length doesn't change often, so it can save in the tcp_sock. And
> +	 * set BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CACHE_CB_FLAG to no bpf call.
> +	 */
> +	BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CACHE_CB_FLAG = (1<<7),
>  /* Mask of all currently supported cb flags */
> -	BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS       = 0x7F,
> +	BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS       = 0xFF,
>  };
>  
>  /* List of known BPF sock_ops operators.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index ea7ad7d99245..0e7480a58012 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -488,12 +488,21 @@ static void bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  {
>  	struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
>  	int err;
> +	struct tcp_sock *th = (struct tcp_sock *)sk;
>  
> -	if (likely(!BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(tcp_sk(sk),
> +	if (likely(!BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(th,
>  					   BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB_FLAG)) ||
>  	    !*remaining)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (likely(BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(th,
> +					  BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CACHE_CB_FLAG)) &&
> +	    th->bpf_opt_len) {
> +		*remaining -= th->bpf_opt_len;

What if *remaining value shrinks from one call to the next?

BPF sock_ops program can't react to change. Feels like there should be a
safety check to prevent an underflow.

> +		opts->bpf_opt_len = th->bpf_opt_len;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* *remaining has already been aligned to 4 bytes, so *remaining >= 4 */
>  
>  	/* init sock_ops */
> @@ -538,6 +547,7 @@ static void bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	opts->bpf_opt_len = *remaining - sock_ops.remaining_opt_len;
>  	/* round up to 4 bytes */
>  	opts->bpf_opt_len = (opts->bpf_opt_len + 3) & ~3;
> +	th->bpf_opt_len = opts->bpf_opt_len;
>  
>  	*remaining -= opts->bpf_opt_len;
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 90706a47f6ff..f2092de1f432 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -6892,8 +6892,14 @@ enum {
>  	 * options first before the BPF program does.
>  	 */
>  	BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB_FLAG = (1<<6),
> +	/* Fast path to reserve space in a skb under
> +	 * sock_ops->op == BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB.
> +	 * opt length doesn't change often, so it can save in the tcp_sock. And
> +	 * set BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CACHE_CB_FLAG to no bpf call.
> +	 */
> +	BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CACHE_CB_FLAG = (1<<7),

Have you considered a bpf_reserve_hdr_opt() flag instead?

An example or test coverage would to show this API extension in action
would help.

>  /* Mask of all currently supported cb flags */
> -	BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS       = 0x7F,
> +	BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS       = 0xFF,
>  };
>  
>  /* List of known BPF sock_ops operators.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15  8:19 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: tcp: Improve bpf write tcp opt performance Feng zhou
2024-05-15  9:48 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2024-05-16  3:15   ` Feng Zhou
2024-05-16 17:15     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-05-16 17:22       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-05-17  7:27       ` Feng Zhou
2024-05-31 10:45         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-06-05  7:37           ` Feng Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87seyjwgme.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yangzhenze@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).