From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libbpf: pinning multiple progs from the same section
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:03:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuqlsdtu.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANaYP3G+rtJuMAaTvdxSZCEtA9tSqh00OCkJ0LoeL7L030w0VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com> writes:
>> > I didn't get this last comment. What I meant is that I want something
>> > like the bpf_object__pin_maps but that doesn't pin the maps, just
>> > exposing its naming part.
>>
>> Right, OK. Why, though? I can kinda see how it could be convenient to
>> (basically )make libbpf behave as if all maps has the 'pinning'
>> attribute set, for map reuse. But I'm not sure I can think any concrete
>> use cases where this would be needed. What's yours?
>>
>
> I am using the same bpf objects (more specifically, the new skeleton
> feature) in two different processes that need access to the same
> maps/programs (for example, they both need access to shared maps).
> Thus, I want to reuse the entire object in both. Since we already have
> a way to pin an entire bpf object, I thought it would be convenient to
> have a way of reusing it entirely (though I am fine with pinning and
> reusing each one manually).
> (I cannot set the __uint(pinning, LIBBPF_PIN_BY_NAME) on each since I
> want to share the bss map too)
Ah, see, now *this* could go under the "missing API" header: having a
way to make libbpf pin (and reuse) the auto-generated maps, like you can
do with the 'pinning' attribute.
Andrii, WDYT?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-07 11:35 libbpf: pinning multiple progs from the same section Gilad Reti
2021-02-08 8:57 ` Gilad Reti
2021-02-08 11:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-02-08 11:57 ` Gilad Reti
2021-02-08 14:28 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-02-08 14:44 ` Gilad Reti
2021-02-08 15:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-02-08 15:50 ` Gilad Reti
2021-02-08 17:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-02-08 18:19 ` Gilad Reti
2021-02-08 19:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-02-09 8:35 ` Gilad Reti
2021-02-09 11:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-02-10 20:04 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-08 22:36 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tuqlsdtu.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gilad.reti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox