BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: david.faust@oracle.com, cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Subject: process_l3_headers_v6 in test_xdp_noinline.c
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:24:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zftj9cdu.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)


Hello.
The following function in the BPF selftest progs/test_xdp_noinline.c:

  /* don't believe your eyes!
   * below function has 6 arguments whereas bpf and llvm allow maximum of 5
   * but since it's _static_ llvm can optimize one argument away
   */
  __attribute__ ((noinline))
  static int process_l3_headers_v6(struct packet_description *pckt,
  				 __u8 *protocol, __u64 off,
  				 __u16 *pkt_bytes, void *data,
  				 void *data_end)
  {
  	struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
  	__u64 iph_len;
  	int action;
  
  	ip6h = data + off;
  	if (ip6h + 1 > data_end)
  		return XDP_DROP;
  	iph_len = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
  	*protocol = ip6h->nexthdr;
  	pckt->flow.proto = *protocol;
  	*pkt_bytes = bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len);
  	off += iph_len;
  	if (*protocol == 45) {
  		return XDP_DROP;
  	} else if (*protocol == 59) {
  		action = parse_icmpv6(data, data_end, off, pckt);
  		if (action >= 0)
  			return action;
  	} else {
  		memcpy(pckt->flow.srcv6, ip6h->saddr.in6_u.u6_addr32, 16);
  		memcpy(pckt->flow.dstv6, ip6h->daddr.in6_u.u6_addr32, 16);
  	}
  	return -1;
  }

Relies, as acknowledged in the comment block, on LLVM optimizing out one
of the arguments.  As it happens GCC doesn't optimize that argument out,
and as a result it fails at compile-time when building
tst_xdp_noinline.c.

Would it be possible to rewrite this particular test to not rely on that
particular optimization?

TIA.

             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24 12:24 Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-04-24 19:37 ` process_l3_headers_v6 in test_xdp_noinline.c Alexei Starovoitov
2024-04-24 20:12   ` Jose E. Marchesi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zftj9cdu.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox