BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: syzbot+8cd36f6b65f3cafd400a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix DEVMAP_HASH overflow check on 32-bit arches
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:16:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfvj8tiz.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65dfa50679d0a_2beb3208c8@john.notmuch>

John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> writes:

> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> The devmap code allocates a number hash buckets equal to the next power of two
>> of the max_entries value provided when creating the map. When rounding up to the
>> next power of two, the 32-bit variable storing the number of buckets can
>> overflow, and the code checks for overflow by checking if the truncated 32-bit value
>> is equal to 0. However, on 32-bit arches the rounding up itself can overflow
>> mid-way through, because it ends up doing a left-shift of 32 bits on an unsigned
>> long value. If the size of an unsigned long is four bytes, this is undefined
>> behaviour, so there is no guarantee that we'll end up with a nice and tidy
>> 0-value at the end.
>> 
>> Syzbot managed to turn this into a crash on arm32 by creating a DEVMAP_HASH with
>> max_entries > 0x80000000 and then trying to update it. Fix this by moving the
>> overflow check to before the rounding up operation.
>> 
>> Fixes: 6f9d451ab1a3 ("xdp: Add devmap_hash map type for looking up devices by hashed index")
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000ed666a0611af6818@google.com
>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+8cd36f6b65f3cafd400a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 8 +++-----
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>> index a936c704d4e7..9b2286f9c6da 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>> @@ -130,13 +130,11 @@ static int dev_map_init_map(struct bpf_dtab *dtab, union bpf_attr *attr)
>>  	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&dtab->map, attr);
>>  
>>  	if (attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH) {
>> -		dtab->n_buckets = roundup_pow_of_two(dtab->map.max_entries);
>> -
>> -		if (!dtab->n_buckets) /* Overflow check */
>> +		if (dtab->map.max_entries > U32_MAX / 2)
>>  			return -EINVAL;
>> -	}
>>  
>> -	if (attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH) {
>> +		dtab->n_buckets = roundup_pow_of_two(dtab->map.max_entries);
>> +
>>  		dtab->dev_index_head = dev_map_create_hash(dtab->n_buckets,
>>  							   dtab->map.numa_node);
>>  		if (!dtab->dev_index_head)
>> -- 
>> 2.43.2
>> 
>
> I'm fairly sure this code was just taken from the hashtab implementation.

Yup, it was :)

> Do we also need a fix there?
>
>         /* hash table size must be power of 2 */
>         htab->n_buckets = roundup_pow_of_two(htab->map.max_entries);
>
> The u32 check in hashtab is,
>
>         /* prevent zero size kmalloc and check for u32 overflow */
>         if (htab->n_buckets == 0 ||
>             htab->n_buckets > U32_MAX / sizeof(struct bucket))
>                 goto free_htab;

Yeah, I don't see any reason why this wouldn't be susceptible to the
same issue. I'll send a follow-up to apply the same fix there.

-Toke


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27 15:27 [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix DEVMAP_HASH overflow check on 32-bit arches Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-28 21:26 ` John Fastabend
2024-02-29 10:16   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2024-02-29 20:39     ` John Fastabend
2024-03-01 13:02       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-03-01 17:22         ` John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zfvj8tiz.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+8cd36f6b65f3cafd400a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox