bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:39:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b3e804bc23d44ba3a30b9d69e6590bede857ed3.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230713060718.388258-1-yhs@fb.com>

On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 23:07 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > In previous discussion ([1]), it is agreed that we should introduce
> > cpu version 4 (llvm flag -mcpu=v4) which contains some instructions
> > which can simplify code, make code easier to understand, fix the
> > existing problem, or simply for feature completeness. More specifically,
> > the following new insns are proposed:
> >   . sign extended load
> >   . sign extended mov
> >   . bswap
> >   . signed div/mod
> >   . ja with 32-bit offset
> > 
> > This patch set added kernel support for insns proposed in [1] except
> > BPF_ST which already has full kernel support. Beside the above proposed
> > insns, LLVM will generate BPF_ST insn as well under -mcpu=v4 ([2]).
> > 
> > The patchset implements interpreter and jit support for these new
> > insns as well as necessary verifier support.

Hi Yonghong,

Sorry for delayed response, I'm still in the middle of the series.
I've tested this patch-set using updated LLVM version and have
a few notes:
- kernel/bpf/disasm.c needs an update to handle new instructions;
- test_verifier test 'invalid 64-bit BPF_END' from basic_instr.c
 is failing because '.code = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_END | BPF_TO_LE'
 is now valid;
- I've looked through the usage of BPF_LDX and found that there
 is a function seccomp.c:seccomp_check_filter(), that directly
 checks possible CLASS / CODE combinations. Should this function
 be updated to handle new instructions?

Thanks,
Eduard

> > 
> > To test this patch set, you need to have latest llvm from 'main' branch
> > of llvm-project repo and apply [2] on top of it.
> > 
> >   [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4bfe98be-5333-1c7e-2f6d-42486c8ec039@meta.com/
> >   [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D144829
> > 
> > Changelogs:
> >   RFCv1 -> v2:
> >    . add more verifier supports for signed extend load and mov insns.
> >    . rename some insn names to be more consistent with intel practice.
> >    . add cpuv4 test runner for test progs.
> >    . add more unit and C tests.
> >    . add documentation.
> > 
> > Yonghong Song (15):
> >   bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns
> >   bpf: Fix sign-extension ctx member accesses
> >   bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns
> >   bpf: Support new unconditional bswap instruction
> >   bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions.
> >   bpf: Fix jit blinding with new sdiv/smov insns
> >   bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction
> >   selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing
> >   selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension load insns
> >   selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension mov insns
> >   selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new bswap insns
> >   selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sdiv/smod insns
> >   selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new gotol insn
> >   selftests/bpf: Test ldsx with more complex cases
> >   docs/bpf: Add documentation for new instructions
> > 
> >  Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst           |   5 -
> >  .../bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst   | 100 ++-
> >  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   | 131 ++-
> >  include/linux/filter.h                        |  14 +-
> >  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   1 +
> >  kernel/bpf/cgroup.c                           |  14 +-
> >  kernel/bpf/core.c                             | 174 +++-
> >  kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         | 315 ++++++--
> >  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   1 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore        |   2 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |  18 +-
> >  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |   9 +-
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ldsx_insn.c |  88 ++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |  10 +
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_ldsx_insn.c      |  75 ++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bswap.c      |  45 ++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_gotol.c      |  30 +
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c       | 115 +++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_movsx.c      | 177 ++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sdiv.c       | 763 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  20 files changed, 1929 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ldsx_insn.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ldsx_insn.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bswap.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_gotol.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_movsx.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sdiv.c
> > 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-17  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-13  6:07 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4 Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/15] bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-14 18:13   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-14 23:22     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-17  1:39   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19  0:15   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19  2:28     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/15] bpf: Fix sign-extension ctx member accesses Yonghong Song
2023-07-17  1:40   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19  0:40     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/15] bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-17  1:41   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19  1:17     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-19 12:53       ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 15:59         ` Fangrui Song
2023-07-19 16:57           ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/15] bpf: Support new unconditional bswap instruction Yonghong Song
2023-07-17  1:42   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19  1:22     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/15] bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions Yonghong Song
2023-07-18 23:00   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19  2:30     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-19  2:44       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-19  6:57         ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/15] bpf: Fix jit blinding with new sdiv/smov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/15] bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/15] selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:18   ` Fangrui Song
2023-07-13  6:25     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension load insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-18 23:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension mov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new bswap insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sdiv/smod insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-18 23:10   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new gotol insn Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test ldsx with more complex cases Yonghong Song
2023-07-13  6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/15] docs/bpf: Add documentation for new instructions Yonghong Song
2023-07-14 18:28   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-14 23:26     ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-14 23:33   ` Dave Thaler
2023-07-14 23:33     ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2023-07-15  0:23     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-15  0:23       ` [Bpf] " Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-14 23:34   ` Dave Thaler
2023-07-14 23:34     ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2023-07-17  1:39 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-07-17 16:56   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4 Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-17 17:04     ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-17 21:52   ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-21 14:56     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-07-24  0:17       ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-07-24  1:04         ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-07-24  2:35           ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b3e804bc23d44ba3a30b9d69e6590bede857ed3.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).