From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:39:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b3e804bc23d44ba3a30b9d69e6590bede857ed3.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230713060718.388258-1-yhs@fb.com>
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 23:07 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > In previous discussion ([1]), it is agreed that we should introduce
> > cpu version 4 (llvm flag -mcpu=v4) which contains some instructions
> > which can simplify code, make code easier to understand, fix the
> > existing problem, or simply for feature completeness. More specifically,
> > the following new insns are proposed:
> > . sign extended load
> > . sign extended mov
> > . bswap
> > . signed div/mod
> > . ja with 32-bit offset
> >
> > This patch set added kernel support for insns proposed in [1] except
> > BPF_ST which already has full kernel support. Beside the above proposed
> > insns, LLVM will generate BPF_ST insn as well under -mcpu=v4 ([2]).
> >
> > The patchset implements interpreter and jit support for these new
> > insns as well as necessary verifier support.
Hi Yonghong,
Sorry for delayed response, I'm still in the middle of the series.
I've tested this patch-set using updated LLVM version and have
a few notes:
- kernel/bpf/disasm.c needs an update to handle new instructions;
- test_verifier test 'invalid 64-bit BPF_END' from basic_instr.c
is failing because '.code = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_END | BPF_TO_LE'
is now valid;
- I've looked through the usage of BPF_LDX and found that there
is a function seccomp.c:seccomp_check_filter(), that directly
checks possible CLASS / CODE combinations. Should this function
be updated to handle new instructions?
Thanks,
Eduard
> >
> > To test this patch set, you need to have latest llvm from 'main' branch
> > of llvm-project repo and apply [2] on top of it.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4bfe98be-5333-1c7e-2f6d-42486c8ec039@meta.com/
> > [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D144829
> >
> > Changelogs:
> > RFCv1 -> v2:
> > . add more verifier supports for signed extend load and mov insns.
> > . rename some insn names to be more consistent with intel practice.
> > . add cpuv4 test runner for test progs.
> > . add more unit and C tests.
> > . add documentation.
> >
> > Yonghong Song (15):
> > bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns
> > bpf: Fix sign-extension ctx member accesses
> > bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns
> > bpf: Support new unconditional bswap instruction
> > bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions.
> > bpf: Fix jit blinding with new sdiv/smov insns
> > bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction
> > selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing
> > selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension load insns
> > selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension mov insns
> > selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new bswap insns
> > selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sdiv/smod insns
> > selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new gotol insn
> > selftests/bpf: Test ldsx with more complex cases
> > docs/bpf: Add documentation for new instructions
> >
> > Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst | 5 -
> > .../bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 100 ++-
> > arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 131 ++-
> > include/linux/filter.h | 14 +-
> > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> > kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 14 +-
> > kernel/bpf/core.c | 174 +++-
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 315 ++++++--
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore | 2 +
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 18 +-
> > .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 9 +-
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ldsx_insn.c | 88 ++
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 10 +
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_ldsx_insn.c | 75 ++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bswap.c | 45 ++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_gotol.c | 30 +
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c | 115 +++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_movsx.c | 177 ++++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sdiv.c | 763 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 20 files changed, 1929 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ldsx_insn.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ldsx_insn.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bswap.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_gotol.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_movsx.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sdiv.c
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-17 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-13 6:07 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4 Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/15] bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-14 18:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-14 23:22 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-17 1:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 0:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 2:28 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/15] bpf: Fix sign-extension ctx member accesses Yonghong Song
2023-07-17 1:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 0:40 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/15] bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-17 1:41 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 1:17 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-19 12:53 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 15:59 ` Fangrui Song
2023-07-19 16:57 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/15] bpf: Support new unconditional bswap instruction Yonghong Song
2023-07-17 1:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 1:22 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/15] bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions Yonghong Song
2023-07-18 23:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-19 2:30 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-19 2:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-19 6:57 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/15] bpf: Fix jit blinding with new sdiv/smov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/15] bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/15] selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:18 ` Fangrui Song
2023-07-13 6:25 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension load insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-18 23:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension mov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new bswap insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sdiv/smod insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-18 23:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new gotol insn Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test ldsx with more complex cases Yonghong Song
2023-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/15] docs/bpf: Add documentation for new instructions Yonghong Song
2023-07-14 18:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-14 23:26 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-14 23:33 ` Dave Thaler
2023-07-14 23:33 ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2023-07-15 0:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-15 0:23 ` [Bpf] " Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-14 23:34 ` Dave Thaler
2023-07-14 23:34 ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2023-07-17 1:39 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-07-17 16:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4 Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-17 17:04 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-17 21:52 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-21 14:56 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-07-24 0:17 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-07-24 1:04 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-07-24 2:35 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b3e804bc23d44ba3a30b9d69e6590bede857ed3.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).