From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Tariq Toukan" <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
gal@nvidia.com, "Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
tariqt@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] samples/bpf: fixup some tools to be able to support xdp multibuffer
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 14:33:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b8107bd-87da-7a86-6284-119e440d2aaf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230105101642.1a31f278@kernel.org>
On 05/01/2023 20:16, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:57:32 -0500 Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>>> So my main concern would be that if we "allow" this, the only way to
>>> write an interoperable XDP program will be to use bpf_xdp_load_bytes()
>>> for every packet access. Which will be slower than DPA, so we may end up
>>> inadvertently slowing down all of the XDP ecosystem, because no one is
>>> going to bother with writing two versions of their programs. Whereas if
>>> you can rely on packet headers always being in the linear part, you can
>>> write a lot of the "look at headers and make a decision" type programs
>>> using just DPA, and they'll work for multibuf as well.
>>
>> The question I would have is what is really the 'slow down' for
>> bpf_xdp_load_bytes() vs DPA? I know you and Jesper can tell me how many
>> instructions each use. :)
>
> Until we have an efficient and inlined DPA access to frags an
> unconditional memcpy() of the first 2 cachelines-worth of headers
> in the driver must be faster than a piece-by-piece bpf_xdp_load_bytes()
> onto the stack, right?
>
>> Taking a step back...years ago Dave mentioned wanting to make XDP
>> programs easy to write and it feels like using these accessor APIs would
>> help accomplish that. If the kernel examples use bpf_xdp_load_bytes()
>> accessors everywhere then that would accomplish that.
>
> I've been pushing for an skb_header_pointer()-like helper but
> the semantics were not universally loved :)
Maybe it's time to re-consider.
Is it something like an API that given an offset returns a pointer +
allowed length to be accessed?
This sounds like a good direction to me, that avoids having any
linear-part-length assumptions, while preserving good performance.
Maybe we can still require/guarantee that each single header (eth, ip,
tcp, ...) does not cross a frag/page boundary. For otherwise, a prog
needs to handle cases where headers span several fragments, so it has to
reconstruct the header by copying the different parts into some local
buffer.
This can be achieved by having another assumption that AFAIK already
holds today: all fragments are of size PAGE_SIZE.
Regards,
Tariq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-08 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 17:54 [PATCH net-next v2] samples/bpf: fixup some tools to be able to support xdp multibuffer Andy Gospodarek
2022-06-22 2:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-03 12:55 ` Tariq Toukan
2023-01-03 15:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-04 1:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 8:44 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2023-01-04 12:28 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-05 1:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05 7:20 ` Tariq Toukan
2023-01-05 15:43 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-05 16:57 ` Andy Gospodarek
2023-01-05 18:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 13:56 ` Andy Gospodarek
2023-01-08 12:33 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
[not found] ` <8369e348-a8ec-cb10-f91f-4277e5041a27@nvidia.com>
2023-01-08 12:42 ` Tariq Toukan
2023-01-09 13:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-05 22:07 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-06 17:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-05 16:22 ` Andy Gospodarek
2023-01-10 20:59 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2023-01-13 21:07 ` Tariq Toukan
2023-01-25 12:49 ` Tariq Toukan
2023-01-05 16:18 ` Andy Gospodarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b8107bd-87da-7a86-6284-119e440d2aaf@gmail.com \
--to=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox