From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/3] bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 10:19:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cabc830-7aa1-4830-bc97-8756145d45f8@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513040354.ED092C2BCC7@smtp.kernel.org>
On 5/12/26 9:03 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Sleepable build ID parsing unconditionally fails on systems where CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK is disabled.
> - [High] Incorrect VMA classification using `!vma->vm_file` violates MM API and risks unsafe driver reads.
> - [High] Missing caching causes a severe performance regression due to redundant file I/O for IPs within the same VMA.
Sashiko essentially repeated the issues flagged by BPF CI bot,
which I already replied to. Same in the second message.
Ignoring these for now.
> --
>
> commit 8402e095f9b6a82fa06a32af10007e005d6c5e76
> Author: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks
>
> This commit updates the stackmap sleepable path to avoid calling
> build_id_parse_file() while holding mmap_lock or a per-VMA read lock. It
> achieves this by acquiring a stable read-side reference to the backing file,
> dropping the VMA lock, and then parsing the build ID.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218005818.614819-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260128183232.2854138-1-andrii@kernel.org/
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> index 4ef0fd06cea58..c1e96df360c3f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -158,6 +159,105 @@ static inline void stack_map_build_id_set_ip(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id)
>> memset(id->build_id, 0, BUILD_ID_SIZE_MAX);
>> }
>>
>> +struct stack_map_vma_lock {
>> + bool vma_locked;
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> + struct mm_struct *mm;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct vm_area_struct *
>> +stack_map_lock_vma(struct stack_map_vma_lock *lock, unsigned long ip)
>> +{
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> + vma = vma_lookup(mm, ip);
>> + if (!vma) {
>> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
>> + if (!vma_start_read_locked(vma)) {
>> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> +#else
>> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> + return NULL;
>> +#endif
>
> Does this unconditionally fail on systems where CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK is
> disabled?
>
> Looking at the fallback block, it unlocks the mmap_read_lock and returns
> NULL. Will this cause stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable() to always
> receive a NULL VMA and fail to extract any build IDs on architectures lacking
> per-VMA lock support?
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>> + u32 trace_nr)
>> +{
>> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>> + struct stack_map_vma_lock lock = {
>> + .vma_locked = false,
>> + .vma = NULL,
>> + .mm = mm,
>> + };
>> + unsigned long vm_pgoff, vm_start;
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> + struct file *file;
>> + u64 ip;
>> +
>> + for (u32 i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>
> I see this is addressed in a later commit in the series ("bpf: Cache build
> IDs in sleepable stackmap path"), but is there a risk of a performance
> regression here?
>
> The original non-sleepable path cached the previous VMA and build ID. Since
> that caching logic is missing here, will adjacent stack frames from the same
> binary repeatedly trigger file reference acquisitions and blocking reads for
> every single IP?
>
>> + ip = READ_ONCE(id_offs[i].ip);
>> + vma = stack_map_lock_vma(&lock, ip);
>> + if (!vma || !vma->vm_file) {
>
> Is checking vma->vm_file sufficient to determine if the mapping is
> file-backed?
>
> Anonymous VMAs, such as private mappings of /dev/zero or driver mappings
> calling vma_set_anonymous(), can legitimately have vm_file set.
>
> Could passing these anonymous VMAs to build_id_parse_file() invoke
> __kernel_read() on a driver's read handler, leading to unintended side
> effects or hangs?
>
> Would it be safer to use !vma_is_anonymous(vma) instead?
>
>> + stack_map_build_id_set_ip(&id_offs[i]);
>> + stack_map_unlock_vma(&lock);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
>> + vm_pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff;
>> + vm_start = vma->vm_start;
>> + stack_map_unlock_vma(&lock);
>> +
>> + /* build_id_parse_file() may block on filesystem reads */
>> + if (build_id_parse_file(file, id_offs[i].build_id, NULL)) {
>> + stack_map_build_id_set_ip(&id_offs[i]);
>> + fput(file);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 3:29 [PATCH bpf v3 0/3] bpf: Implement stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable() Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-12 3:29 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/3] bpf: Factor out stack_map_build_id_set_ip() in stackmap.c Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-12 3:29 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/3] bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-12 4:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 17:09 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-13 4:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 17:19 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-05-12 3:29 ` [PATCH bpf v3 3/3] bpf: Cache build IDs in sleepable stackmap path Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-13 4:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cabc830-7aa1-4830-bc97-8756145d45f8@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox